Literature DB >> 24036995

The impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insurance.

Lydia E Pace1, Stacie B Dusetzina, A Mark Fendrick, Nancy L Keating, Vanessa K Dalton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is highly effective but also has higher initiation costs than oral contraceptive methods, which may contribute to relatively low use. The Affordable Care Act requires most private insurance plans to cover contraceptive services without patient cost-sharing. Whether this mandate will increase LARC use is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between cost-sharing and use of LARC among privately insured women.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using Truven Health MarketScan data from January 2011 to December 2011.
SUBJECTS: Women aged 14-45 years with continuous insurance coverage enrolled in health plan products that covered branded and generic oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and intrauterine devices (IUDs). We selected women using OCPs and IUDs as these are the most commonly used short-acting and long-acting reversible methods, respectively (N=1,682,425). MEASURES: Multivariable regression was used to assess the association of the level of out-of-pocket costs for IUDs for each patient's plan and IUD initiation, adjusting for out-of-pocket costs for branded and generic OCPs and patient characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, 5.5% of women initiated an IUD in 2011. After adjustment, IUD initiation was less likely among women with higher versus lower co-pays (adjusted risk ratio=0.65; 95% CI, 0.64-0.67). Women who saw an obstetrician/gynecologist during 2011 were more likely to initiate an IUD (adjusted risk ratio=2.49; 95% CI, 2.45-2.53).
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of IUD use are low among privately insured women in the United States, and higher cost-sharing is associated with lower rates of IUD use. Together with other measures to promote LARC use, eliminating co-pays for contraception could promote the use of these more effective and cost-effective methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24036995      PMCID: PMC6702955          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a97b5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  28 in total

1.  Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Joanne M Garrett; Thomas R Konrad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Ellen Hertzmark
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre- and post-benefit change.

Authors:  Debbie Postlethwaite; James Trussell; Anthony Zoolakis; Ruth Shabear; Diana Petitti
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Impact of decreasing copayments on medication adherence within a disease management environment.

Authors:  Michael E Chernew; Mayur R Shah; Arnold Wegh; Stephen N Rosenberg; Iver A Juster; Allison B Rosen; Michael C Sokol; Kristina Yu-Isenberg; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Expanding access to intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Rebecca H Allen; Alisa B Goldberg; David A Grimes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Health care providers' knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kira Levy; Rachel Ruskin; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell; Anjana M Lalla; Quan V Doan; Eileen Reyes; Lionel Pinto; Joseph Gricar
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Trends in US women's use of sexual and reproductive health care services, 1995-2002.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use.

Authors:  David J Landry; Junhow Wei; Jennifer J Frost
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Universal access to no-cost contraception for youth in Canada.

Authors:  Giuseppina Di Meglio; Elisabeth Yorke
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Changes to Contraceptive Method Use at Title X Clinics Following Delaware Contraceptive Access Now, 2008-2017.

Authors:  Michel Boudreaux; Liyang Xie; Yoon Sun Choi; Dylan Habeeb Roby; Michael S Rendall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Women's health and the Affordable Care Act: high hopes versus harsh realities?

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; A Mark Fendrick; Melissa Zochowski; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Kirsten M J Thompson; Suzan Goodman; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The Association between High-Deductible Health Plan Transition and Contraception and Birth Rates.

Authors:  Amy J Graves; Katy B Kozhimannil; Ken P Kleinman; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch.

Authors:  Katherine He; Vanessa K Dalton; Melissa K Zochowski; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Comparing Gold-standard Copayment and Coinsurance Values From Claims Processing Engines to Values Derived From Behavioral Health Claims Databases.

Authors:  Sarah A Friedman; Haiyong Xu; Francisca Azocar; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Early Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Uptake of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Stacie B Dusetzina; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Can youth get the contraception they want? Results of a pilot study in the province of Quebec.

Authors:  Giuseppina Di Meglio; Jessica Yeates; Gillian Seidman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 10.  Contraceptive Coverage and the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Mary Tschann; Reni Soon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.