Literature DB >> 35982356

Constitutive and Induced Defenses in Long-lived Pines Do Not Trade Off but Are Influenced by Climate.

Justin B Runyon1, Barbara J Bentz2, Claire A Qubain3.   

Abstract

Plants resist herbivores and pathogens by using constitutive (baseline) and inducible (change in defense after an attack) defenses. Inducibility has long been predicted to trade off with constitutive defense, reflecting the economic use of resources. However, empirical evidence for such tradeoffs is variable, and we still lack understanding about when and where defense trade-offs occur. We tested for tradeoffs between constitutive and induced defenses in natural populations of three species of long-lived pines (Pinus balfouriana, P. flexilis, P. longaeva) that differ greatly in constitutive defense and resistance to mountain pine beetle (MPB, Dendroctonus ponderosae). We also assessed how climate influenced constitutive and inducible defenses. At seven high-elevation sites in the western U.S., we simulated MPB attack to induce defenses and measured concentrations of terpene-based phloem defenses on days 0, 15, and 30. Constitutive and induced defenses did not trade off among or within species. Simulated MPB attack induced large increases in defense concentrations in all species independent of constitutive levels. MPB and its symbiotic fungi typically kill trees and thus could be selective forces maintaining strong inducibility within and among species. The contrasting constitutive concentrations in these species could be driven by the adaptation for specializing in harsh, high-elevation environments (e.g., P. balfouriana and P. longaeva) or by competition (e.g., P. flexilis), though these hypotheses have not been empirically examined. Climate influenced defenses, with the greatest concentrations of constitutive and induced defenses occurring at the coldest and driest sites. The interactions between climate and defenses have implications for these species under climate change.
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defenses; Mountain pine beetle; Pinus balfouriana; Pinus flexilis; Pinus longaeva

Year:  2022        PMID: 35982356     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-022-01377-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.793


  37 in total

1.  Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley; J P Bryant; F S Chapin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Ageing of trees: application of general ageing theories.

Authors:  Eva Brutovská; Andrea Sámelová; Jozef Dušička; Karol Mičieta
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  Trade-offs constrain the evolution of an inducible defense within but not between plant species.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Amy P Hastings
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Chemical similarity between historical and novel host plants promotes range and host expansion of the mountain pine beetle in a naïve host ecosystem.

Authors:  Nadir Erbilgin; Cary Ma; Caroline Whitehouse; Bin Shan; Ahmed Najar; Maya Evenden
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 5.  Oleoresin defenses in conifers: chemical diversity, terpene synthases and limitations of oleoresin defense under climate change.

Authors:  Jose M Celedon; Jörg Bohlmann
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Celia K Boone; Jörg Bohlmann; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  A phylogeographical analysis of the range disjunction for foxtail pine (Pinus balfouriana, Pinaceae): the role of Pleistocene glaciation.

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Brandon R Tearse; Benjamin D Hall
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Toxicity of Pine Monoterpenes to Mountain Pine Beetle.

Authors:  Christine C Chiu; Christopher I Keeling; Joerg Bohlmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Defense traits in the long-lived Great Basin bristlecone pine and resistance to the native herbivore mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Barbara J Bentz; Sharon M Hood; E Matthew Hansen; James C Vandygriff; Karen E Mock
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Low offspring survival in mountain pine beetle infesting the resistant Great Basin bristlecone pine supports the preference-performance hypothesis.

Authors:  Erika L Eidson; Karen E Mock; Barbara J Bentz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.