Literature DB >> 22072221

Why mammography screening has not lived up to expectations from the randomised trials.

Peter C Gøtzsche1, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Per-Henrik Zahl, Jan Mæhlen.   

Abstract

We analysed the relation between tumour sizes and stages and the reported effects on breast cancer mortality with and without screening in trials and observational studies. The average tumour sizes in all the trials suggest only a 12% reduction in breast cancer mortality, which agrees with the 10% reported in the most reliable trials. Recent studies of tumour sizes and tumour stages show that screening has not lowered the rate of advanced cancers. In agreement with this, recent observational studies of breast cancer mortality have failed to find an effect of screening. In contrast, screening leads to serious harms in healthy women through overdiagnosis with subsequent overtreatment and false-positive mammograms. We suggest that the rationale for breast screening be urgently reassessed by policy-makers. The observed decline in breast cancer mortality in many countries seems to be caused by improved adjuvant therapy and breast cancer awareness, not screening. We also believe it is more important to reduce the incidence of cancer than to detect it 'early.' Avoiding getting screening mammograms reduces the risk of becoming a breast cancer patient by one-third.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22072221     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9867-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  22 in total

1.  Time to stop mammography screening?

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Clinical economics: a concept to optimize healthcare services].

Authors:  F Porzsolt; K Bauer; D Henne-Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  The global challenge of reducing breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Robert Burton; Robin Bell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

6.  Screening, case finding or primary cancer prevention in the developing world?

Authors:  Gustaf Edgren; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  What are our Options in the Fight against Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Ikram A Burney; Muhammad Furrukh; Mansour S Al-Moundhri
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-04-07

Review 8.  Next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular markers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Hitchintan Kaur; Shihong Mao; Seema Shah; David H Gorski; Stephen A Krawetz; Bonnie F Sloane; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.225

9.  Innovations in health care and mortality trends from five cancers in seven European countries between 1970 and 2005.

Authors:  Rasmus Hoffmann; Iris Plug; Martin McKee; Bernadette Khoshaba; Ragnar Westerling; Caspar Looman; Gregoire Rey; Eric Jougla; Katrin Lang; Kersti Pärna; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Person-to-Person Cancer Transmission via Allogenic Blood Transfusion.

Authors:  Eugen Molodysky; Ross Grant
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.