Literature DB >> 26359135

Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned.

Peter C Gøtzsche1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26359135      PMCID： PMC4582264          DOI： 10.1177/0141076815602452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN： 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.
  24 in total

1.  Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality?

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; John D Keen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.

Authors:  Mette Kalager; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Volkert Dirk Siersma
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 5.  Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening.

Authors:  P Autier; M Boniol; R Middleton; J F Doré; C Héry; T Zheng; A Gavin
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Anna Gavin; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-28

7.  Possible net harms of breast cancer screening: updated modelling of Forrest report.

Authors:  James Raftery; Maria Chorozoglou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-12-08

Review 8.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Overestimated lead times in cancer screening has led to substantial underestimation of overdiagnosis.

Authors:  P-H Zahl; K J Jørgensen; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
View more
  11 in total

1.  'Catch it early, save a life and save a breast': this misleading mantra of mammography.

Authors:  Michael Baum
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

3.  A modified source-detector configuration for the discrimination between normal and diseased human breast based on the continuous-wave diffuse optical imaging approach: a simulation study.

Authors:  Shimaa Mahdy; Omnia Hamdy; Mohammed A Hassan; Mohamed A A Eldosoky
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.

Authors:  José M Baena-Cañada; Violeta Luque-Ribelles; Alicia Quílez-Cutillas; Petra Rosado-Varela; Encarnación Benítez-Rodríguez; Soledad Márquez-Calderón; Juan Manuel Rivera-Bautista
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The discordance between evidence and health policy in the United States: the science of translational research and the critical role of diverse stakeholders.

Authors:  Mohsen Malekinejad; Hacsi Horvath; Harry Snyder; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-08-16

6.  Breast cancer mortality and associated factors in São Paulo State, Brazil: an ecological analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Simone Grilo Diniz; Alessandra Cristina Guedes Pellini; Adeylson Guimarães Ribeiro; Marcello Vannucci Tedardi; Marina Jorge de Miranda; Michelle Mosna Touso; Oswaldo Santos Baquero; Patrícia Carlos Dos Santos; Francisco Chiaravalloti-Neto
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  The current status of risk-stratified breast screening.

Authors:  Ash Kieran Clift; David Dodwell; Simon Lord; Stavros Petrou; Sir Michael Brady; Gary S Collins; Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 9.075

8.  Changing Trends in the Proportional Incidence and Five-year Net Survival of Screened and Non-screened Breast Cancers among Women During 1995-2011 in England.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Kwok Wong; Shou-En Lu; John Broggio; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Transl Pathol       Date:  2022-03-18

Review 9.  Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.

Authors:  Meredith A Jones; Warid Islam; Rozwat Faiz; Xuxin Chen; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.738

10.  Preliminary Results of a New Auxiliary Mechatronic Near-Field Radar System to 3D Mammography for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh Dagheyan; Ali Molaei; Richard Obermeier; Andrew Westwood; Aida Martinez; Jose Angel Martinez Lorenzo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.576
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.