Literature DB >> 10037542

Exploring the concepts of intended, planned, and wanted pregnancy.

R C Fischer1, J B Stanford, P Jameson, M J DeWitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of terms have been used to define the intention status of pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to explore how women relate to these terms and how they define the intention status of their pregnancies. Improved understanding of how women use these terms may enhance communication between physicians, patients, and families.
METHODS: This qualitative study used in-depth semistructured interviews to explore how women defined the intention status of current, past, and hypothetical pregnancies. Eighteen women who were seeking prenatal care, elective abortion, or pregnancy testing were interviewed. Most of the subjects were interviewed in the first trimester of a current pregnancy. Four researchers independently reviewed the interview transcripts and summarized the points made by each subject.
RESULTS: Three major themes emerged from the interviews: (1) definitions of terms related to pregnancy varied substantially among women and seemed to be highly correlated to social and cultural influences; (2) the concepts of wanted and unwanted pregnancy were qualitatively distinct from the concepts of planned and unplanned pregnancies and seemed to be more relevant to the decision to continue or abort the pregnancy; and (3) attitudes of the male partners toward the pregnancies were very influential in how women defined their pregnancies.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should explore the attitudes and circumstances of pregnant women, rather than focusing on whether the pregnancy was planned. Support from the significant other and the woman's underlying values about parenthood seem to be of particular importance. Our results also suggest that further studies are needed to determine the best method for measuring the intention status of pregnancy for research and policy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Behavior; Data Collection; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Fertility; Interviews--women; North America; Northern America; Perception--women; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy, Planned; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Psychological Factors; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Research Report; United States; Utah; Women

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10037542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  32 in total

1.  Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness.

Authors:  J B Stanford; R Hobbs; P Jameson; M J DeWitt; R C Fischer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

2.  Parental attitudes about a pregnancy predict birth weight in a low-income population.

Authors:  Robert D Keeley; Alison Birchard; Perry Dickinson; John Steiner; L Miriam Dickinson; Susan Rymer; Blake Palmer; Torri Derback; Allison Kempe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness to select the copper IUD.

Authors:  Rachel L Wright; Caren J Frost; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Adolescent pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes: a longitudinal examination.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosengard; Maureen G Phipps; Nancy E Adler; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Psychosocial correlates of adolescent males' pregnancy intention.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosengard; Maureen G Phipps; Nancy E Adler; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The estimation of unwanted fertility.

Authors:  John B Casterline; Laila O El-Zeini
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2007-11

7.  The Misclassification of Ambivalence in Pregnancy Intentions: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gómez; Stephanie Arteaga; Elodia Villaseñor; Jennet Arcara; Bridget Freihart
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-02-14

8.  Unintended pregnancy in a commercially insured population.

Authors:  Diane C Green; Julie A Gazmararian; Lisa D Mahoney; Nancy A Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09

9.  Comparison of a Timing-Based Measure of Unintended Pregnancy and the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Carolyn L Westhoff; James Trussell; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-08-30

10.  High rate of unintended pregnancy among pregnant women in a maternity hospital in Córdoba, Argentina: a pilot study.

Authors:  Celina Palena; M Valeria Bahamondes; Verónica Schenk; Luis Bahamondes; Julio Fernandez-Funes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.