| Literature DB >> 26556193 |
Onkar Singh1, Tarun Garg1, Goutam Rath1, Amit K Goyal1.
Abstract
Approximately 34 million people were living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) at the end of 2011. From the last two decades, researchers are actively involved in the development of an effective HIV-1 treatment, but the results intended are still doubtful about the eradication of HIV. The HIV-1 virus has gone from being an "inherently untreatable" infectious agent to the one liable to be affected by a range of approved therapies. Candidate microbicides have been developed to target specific steps in the process of viral transmission. Microbicides are self-administered agents that can be applied to vaginal or rectal mucosal surfaces with the aim of preventing, or reducing, the transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV-1. The development of efficient, widely available, and low-cost microbicides to prevent sexually transmitted HIV infections should be given high priority. In this review, we studied the various forms of microbicides, their mechanism of action, and their abundant approaches to control the transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs).Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 26556193 PMCID: PMC4590794 DOI: 10.1155/2014/352425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-9918
Figure 1An overview of microbicides for HIV prevention.
Key events and predictions in the development of microbicides.
| Year | Key events and predictions in the development of microbicides |
|---|---|
| In 1981 | Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) was identified. |
| In 1983 | Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was defined as causative agent. |
| In 1985–1988 | Nonoxynol-9 was reported to destroy HIV |
| In 1992 | Nonoxynol-9 was applied vaginally in the macaque monkey to reduce the risk of infection. |
| In 1994 | International working group on microbicides established Contraceptive Research and Development Program (CONRAD), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Food and Drug Administration, and US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to facilitate global coordination of microbicide development. |
| In 1997 | Nonsurfactant class of microbicides was shown to be safe and acceptable after phase I clinical trials in female volunteers. |
| In 1998 | Phase III trials of nonoxynol-9 show no protection against HIV. |
| In 2000 | First major international conference was devoted to microbicides. |
| In 2001 | Promising microbicides entered phase II clinical trials to verify safety and acceptability. |
| In 2002 | WHO report on nonoxynol-9 concludes that nonoxynol-9 should not be used for HIV/STI prevention. |
| In 2003-2004 | Microbicides expected to enter phase III trials for effectiveness against HIV. |
| In 2007 | First-generation microbicides showed; 50–60% effective against HIV. |
| In 2008 | Researchers discovered that long chain polyanionic compounds could prevent |
| In 2010 | Acid buffering gels could be used to lower vaginal pH and inactivate HIV and were shown to be safe in clinical trials. |
| In 2012-13 | CAPRISA 008, a planned follow-on study to CAPRISA 004, which would evaluate the effectiveness of distributing 1% tenofovir gel in communities where CAPRISA 004 took place, was launched in 2012. Results from the facts 001 trial for 1% tenofovir gel are expected in 2013. |
Mechanism of action of different generations of microbicide candidates.
| Mechanism of action | Candidates |
|---|---|
| First-generation microbicide (GEN-1) | |
| Viral disrupting agents | C-31G (savvy), nonoxynol-9, octoxynol-9, benzalkonium chloride, octyl glycerol/milk lipids, polybiguanides, sodium dodecyl sulphate, Z-14 (acylcarnitine analogue), and so forth. |
|
| |
| Second-generation microbicide (GEN-2) | |
| Blocking HIV binding | Carrageenan, cellulose sulfate, naphthalene sulfonate, PRO 2000/5, dextrin-2-sulfate, heparan sulfate/cholic acid, polyanionic Gp120 inhibitors, polystyrene sulfonate, and so forth. |
|
| |
| New-generation microbicide | |
| gp120-binding agents | mAb b12, CD IgG2, and BMS-806 |
| Gp41-binding agents | T-20 (enfuvirtide), mAb 2F5, 4E10, and T1249 |
| Targeting soluble CD4 receptor | mAb (TNX-355), soluble CD4-IgG |
| Targeting CXCR4 coreceptor | AMD3100, AMD070 small molecules antagonists |
| Targeting CCR5 coreceptor | PRO-140, PSC-RANTES |
| Dendritic cell uptake inhibitor | DC-SIGN and macrophage mannose binding receptor |
| NNRTI (nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) | MIV-150, TMC120, UC781, and S-DABO |
| NtRTIs (nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors) | PMPA (tenofovir) |
| Integrase inhibitors | S-1360, C-731 |
Figure 2Mechanism of action of microbicidal formulations.
Ideal characteristics/attributes of microbicide development.
| Commendable qualities | Attributes |
|---|---|
| Safety | (i) Should not exhibit any localized toxicity. |
| (ii) Avoiding any potential impact on epithelial surfaces and natural innate barriers. | |
| (iii) Prevent from long-term systemic toxicity associated with frequency and duration of product. | |
| (iv) Avoiding impact on fertility and/or not exhibiting any fetal abnormalities. | |
|
| |
| Efficacy | (i) Product must have a significant degree of efficacy. |
| (ii) Exhibit long-term efficacy. | |
| (iii) Do not produce drug resistance. | |
|
| |
| Cost | (i) Must be affordable to at-risk populations. |
| (ii) They are cheap/affordable for mass distribution. | |
|
| |
| Acceptability | (i) Must be acceptable for use in conjunction with sex. |
| (ii) Highly acceptable in the real world and majorly adopted by at-risk populations. | |
|
| |
| Drug delivery | (i) Sufficient drug levels must be maintained in the appropriate compartments of the genital tract or rectum during exposure to virus. |
| (ii) Should exhibit sustained and controlled drug delivery to the target place. | |
|
| |
| Therapy impact | (i) Should not induce drug resistance. |
| (ii) Exhibit significant impact of treatment and prevention of infection. | |
|
| |
| Prioritization | (i) Prioritization should include |
| (ii) Must be prioritized to maximize progress and prevent duplication. | |
List of mucoadhesive polymers along with their bioadhesiveness.
| Mucoadhesive polymers | Bioadhesiveness |
|---|---|
| CMC sodium | Excellent bioadhesiveness (+++) |
| Carbopol 934 | Excellent bioadhesiveness (+++) |
| Polycarbophil | Excellent bioadhesiveness (+++) |
| Poly(acrylic acid/divinylbenzene) | Excellent bioadhesiveness (+++) |
| Sodium alginate | Excellent bioadhesiveness (+++) |
| Hydroxy ethyl cellulose | Excellent bioadhesiveness (+++) |
| HPMC | Excellent bioadhesiveness (+++) |
| Gelatin | Good bioadhesiveness (++) |
| Carrageenan | Fair bioadhesiveness (+) |
| PVA | Fair bioadhesiveness (+) |
| Chitosan | Fair bioadhesiveness (+) |
Factors affecting the bioadhesiveness of mucoadhesive polymers.
| Factors | Effects on the bioadhesiveness of mucoadhesive polymers |
|---|---|
| Concentration of polymer | (i) Optimum concentration of a bioadhesive polymer produces maximum bioadhesion. |
| (ii) In highly concentrated systems, the adhesive strength drops because the coiled molecules become separated from the medium so that the chains accessible for interpenetration become limited [ | |
|
| |
| Molecular weight of polymer | (i) The threshold required for successful bioadhesion is at least 100,000 molecular weight. |
| (ii) For example, polyethylene glycol (PEG), with a molecular weight of 20,000, has little adhesive character, whereas PEG with 200,000 molecular weight has improved, and a PEG with 400,000 has superior adhesive properties [ | |
|
| |
| Flexibility | (i) Flexibility of mucoadhesive polymer is the key for interpenetration and entanglement. |
| (ii) When water-soluble polymers become cross-linked, mobility of polymer chains decreases and thus decreasing the effective penetration into the mucus layer, which finally reduces bioadhesive strength [ | |
|
| |
| pH | (i) pH can influence the formal charge on the surface of mucus as well as certain ionizable bioadhesive polymers. |
| (ii) pH of the medium is chief factor for the degree of hydration of crosslinked polymers, showing every time increased hydration from pH 4 to 7 and then a decrease as alkalinity and ionic strength increases [ | |
|
| |
| Swelling | (i) It mainly depends on the polymer concentration, ionic concentration, and the presence of water. |
| (ii) Formation of slippery mucilage without adhesion after overhydration [ | |
|
| |
| Contact time | (i) Contact time between the bioadhesive and mucus layer determines the extent of swelling and interpenetration of the bioadhesive polymer chains. |
| (ii) Moreover, bioadhesive strength increases as the initial contact time increases [ | |
|
| |
| Mucin turnover | (i) The mucin turnover is anticipated to limit the residence time of the mucoadhesive on the mucus layer. |
| (ii) Mucoadhesive polymers are detached from the surface due to mucin turnover [ | |
|
| |
| Disease states | The physiochemical properties of mucus are known to change during disease conditions such as bacterial and fungal infections of the female reproductive tract [ |
Drug incorporated microbicidal vaginal formulations.
| Polymers | Drug (dosage form) | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose | Dapivirine (vaginal tablet) | Developed as a vaginal microbicide and improved wettability of the drug [ |
|
| ||
| Polycarbophil, carbopol 974P | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (vaginal tablet) | Assess acceptability, safety, and effectiveness in preventing HIV infection [ |
|
| ||
| Polymethacrylate salt | Tenofovir (vaginal solution) | Controlled microbicide delivery template by intravaginal route for HIV prevention [ |
|
| ||
| Propylene glycol caprylate | UC-781(vaginal emulsion) | Enhancing the vaginal absorption of these microbicidal candidates [ |
|
| ||
| Chromophore EL-capryol 90, tween 80 | Fluconazole (FLZ) (vaginal emulsion) | Showed significantly higher ( |
|
| ||
| Carbopol, tween 80 | Nitro imidazole, ornidazole (vaginal emulsion) | A high release was found in the alkaline pH and locally effective in vagina [ |
|
| ||
| Phospholipon 90G, captex 300, pluronic F68, and Cremophor EL | WHI-07, vanadocene dithiocarbamate (vaginal emulsion) | Demonstrated that WHI-07 either alone or in combination with a vanadocene has clinical potential for the development of a dual-function anti-HIV microbicide for sexually active women [ |
|
| ||
| Tragacanth gum, aacacia gum | Miconazole nitrate (vaginal suspension) | Exhibit uniformly distribution of drug and show locally effect to control the infection [ |
|
| ||
| Polycarbophil, carbopol 974P | Tenofovir (TFV), IQP-0528 (vaginal gel) | These gels have the potential for dual compartment use to inhibit the virus entry [ |
|
| ||
| Pluronic | Metronidazole (vaginal gel) | Successfully used for treatment of bacterial vaginosis [ |
|
| ||
| Cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) | Model drug (vaginal cream) | Use as a topical microbicide for preventing HIV-1 infection in humans [ |
|
| ||
| Hydroxyethyl cellulose | Tenofovir (vaginal gel) | Exhibit excellent effectiveness in preventing human immunodeficiency virus transmission [ |
|
| ||
| Hydroxyethyl cellulose | Tenofovir (vaginal ring) | Exhibit potential for the prevention of transmission of (HIV-1) in pig-tailed macaques [ |
|
| ||
| Polyurethane | Pyrimidinedione IQP-0528 (PYD1) IQP-0532 (PYD2) (vaginal ring) | Prophylactic drug delivery systems to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1 [ |
|
| ||
| Polyether urethanes | Dapivirine(vaginal ring) | Sustained delivery of microbicidal agents [ |
|
| ||
| Silicone elastomer | TMC120 (vaginal ring) | Controlled release strategy for delivering microbicidal substances for the prevention of heterosexual transmission of HIV [ |
|
| ||
| Polyvinyl alcohol(PVA) | Pyrimidinedione, IQP-0528 (vaginal films) | Nontoxic in nature and exhibit excellent prevention against HIV infection [ |
|
| ||
| Octylglycerol | Dapivirine, tenofovir,UC781 (vaginal films) | Prevent HIV infection and products are nontoxic to the endogenous vaginal |
|
| ||
| Span 60 or span 40, cholesterol | Nystatin (NYS) (vaginal films) | Reducing its toxicity and making it a more active against vaginal infections [ |
|
| ||
| Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | Retrocyclin analog RC-101 (vaginal films) | Shown to maintain bioactivity for a period of 6 months [ |
|
| ||
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose, xanthan gum | Clindamycin (CL) phosphate (vaginal films) | Exhibit potential vaginal delivery system of CL against bacterial vaginosis [ |
|
| ||
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose/polyethylene glycol 400 | Itraconazole (vaginal films) | Exhibit more effective treatment against vaginal candidiasis and do not affects normal vaginal flora [ |
|
| ||
| Cellulose acetate 1,2-benzenedi carboxylate | Octoxynol-9 or nonoxynol-9 (vaginal films) | Exhibit biocompatibility of solid-dosage forms of anti-HIV virus type 1 microbicides with the human cervicovaginal mucosa modeled |
Outlook behind the disappointing microbicide strategy.
| Prerequisite of microbicide candidates | Probable mechanism | Reason for the failure |
|---|---|---|
| Candidates who require coating the vaginal epithelial lining uniformly. | Barrier for invasion and disruption of virus | Inability of the delivery system to provide an effective and durable microbicide fence along the epithelial lining. |
|
| ||
| Candidates who require retaining at the site to achieve appropriate concentration levels either in local tissues or blood. | Reverse transcriptase inhibitor, integrase inhibitor, and protease inhibitor | Insufficiency of delivery systems to provide sustained and controlled microbicide release. |
|
| ||
| Candidates who require targeting to a particular site | Entry inhibitors (targeting viral and host cell receptors). | Inability of delivery process to target active molecule to required site. |
Preclinical and clinical studies on microbicidal products.
| Studies | Aim of study | Time period |
|---|---|---|
| Preclinical studies | (i) Screening and testing in laboratory. | 1–10 years |
| (ii) Animal studies for the evaluation of the activity and toxicity of active agents. | ||
|
| ||
| Phase I clinical trials | (i) Early testing in small groups of 10–20 human volunteers. | 2-3 years |
| (ii) Confirming the lack of toxicity and the delivery of effective doses. | ||
|
| ||
| Phase II clinical trials | Larger phase II trials are done in many hundreds or up to a few thousands of volunteers to obtain effectiveness data for promising candidates. | 2–5 years |
|
| ||
| Phase III clinical trials | (i) To demonstrate effectiveness, safety, and acceptability in thousands of human volunteers involves large-scale testing. | 2–6 years |
| (ii) It is providing statistically significant data for review by regulatory agencies (e.g., the U.S. FDA or others) before new products can be approved for marketing and use. | ||
|
| ||
| Phase IV study | For microbicides, postmarketing surveillance might also include any long-term effects on HIV disease progression and treatment (including possible selection of drug-resistant HIV when relevant), HIV risk behavior, and interactions with other diseases, therapies, or products. | Indefinitely |
|
| ||
| Other preapproval studies | (i) Data from additional studies are often required by regulatory agencies for the approval of new products. | 2–6 years |
| (ii) Regulatory agencies also require information regarding product manufacturing methods and quality control measures to ensure that the marketed product is the same as the tested product. | ||
|
| ||
| Product introduction and supporting studies | Addressing policy and logistical issues is often the key for the introduction of new health products. For microbicides, many countries will require preintroductory studies in their own populations before allowing the importation and distribution of a new product. | up to 10 years |
New preclinical microbicide candidates with their mechanism of action.
| Mechanism of action | Candidates |
|---|---|
| Vaginal defense enhancer | Genetically engineered probiotics, mucocept HIV, RANTES peptides, and |
|
| |
| Entry/fussion inhibitors | Aptamers, betacyclodextrin, flavinoids, porphyrins, siRNA, silver nanoparticles, ISIS 5060, reterocyclines, and TatCD |
|
| |
| Combination approaches | Buffer gel with dendrimers, M167, BMS, and other ARV |
|
| |
| Microbicide combined with devices | Duet cervical barrier and condoms with alkyl sulfate coating |
|
| |
| Uncharacterized mechanism | CO (ciclo piroxolamine) |
|
| |
| Surfactants | Alkyl sulfates (surfactants and chaotropic agents) |