PURPOSE: This study compared susceptibility of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and normal corneal endothelial cells (CECs) to oxidative stress, and studied the mechanism of oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis in FECD-affected endothelium. METHODS: For in vitro studies, immortalized normal and FECD human corneal endothelial cell lines (HCECi and FECDi, respectively) were exposed to tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBHP). Apoptotic cell populations were distinguished using flow cytometry. Reactive oxygen species production was measured by a horseradish peroxidase assay. For ex vivo studies, CECs were exposed to tBHP. Oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis were assessed by anti-8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine antibody and TUNEL assay, respectively. p53 and phospho-p53 levels were assessed by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Flow cytometry revealed a higher rate of apoptosis in FECDi than that in HCECi after exposure to 0.5 mM (P=0.010) and 1.0 mM tBHP (P=0.041). Further analysis showed increased production of H2O2 by FECDi than that by HCECi. Oxidative DNA damage increased in both normal and FECD CECs after exposure to 0.5 mM tBHP (P=0.031 and 0.022, respectively), leading to a 21% increase in TUNEL-positive CECs in FECD (P=0.015) but no change in normal. Baseline p53 expression was twofold higher in FECD than that in normal endothelium (P=0.002). Immunofluorescence revealed an increase in p53 and phospho-p53 levels in FECD compared with that in normal endothelium. CONCLUSIONS: FECD CECs are more susceptible to oxidative DNA damage and oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis than normal. Increased activation of p53 in FECD suggests that it mediates cell death in susceptible CECs. The authors conclude that p53 plays a critical role in complex mechanisms regulating oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis in FECD.
PURPOSE: This study compared susceptibility of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and normal corneal endothelial cells (CECs) to oxidative stress, and studied the mechanism of oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis in FECD-affected endothelium. METHODS: For in vitro studies, immortalized normal and FECDhuman corneal endothelial cell lines (HCECi and FECDi, respectively) were exposed to tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBHP). Apoptotic cell populations were distinguished using flow cytometry. Reactive oxygen species production was measured by a horseradish peroxidase assay. For ex vivo studies, CECs were exposed to tBHP. Oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis were assessed by anti-8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine antibody and TUNEL assay, respectively. p53 and phospho-p53 levels were assessed by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Flow cytometry revealed a higher rate of apoptosis in FECDi than that in HCECi after exposure to 0.5 mM (P=0.010) and 1.0 mM tBHP (P=0.041). Further analysis showed increased production of H2O2 by FECDi than that by HCECi. Oxidative DNA damage increased in both normal and FECD CECs after exposure to 0.5 mM tBHP (P=0.031 and 0.022, respectively), leading to a 21% increase in TUNEL-positive CECs in FECD (P=0.015) but no change in normal. Baseline p53 expression was twofold higher in FECD than that in normal endothelium (P=0.002). Immunofluorescence revealed an increase in p53 and phospho-p53 levels in FECD compared with that in normal endothelium. CONCLUSIONS:FECD CECs are more susceptible to oxidative DNA damage and oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis than normal. Increased activation of p53 in FECD suggests that it mediates cell death in susceptible CECs. The authors conclude that p53 plays a critical role in complex mechanisms regulating oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis in FECD.
Authors: M Griffith; R Osborne; R Munger; X Xiong; C J Doillon; N L Laycock; M Hakim; Y Song; M A Watsky Journal: Science Date: 1999-12-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Venugopalan D Nair; Kevin St P McNaught; Javier González-Maeso; Stuart C Sealfon; C Warren Olanow Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2006-10-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: C H Chen; P Rama; A H Chen; A Franch; M Sulewski; S Orlin; E H Chen; S H Tseng; H Lee; C C Wang; G Y Hung; M Y Chan; M S Huang; S C Chen Journal: Transplantation Date: 1999-03-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ula V Jurkunas; Ian Rawe; Maya S Bitar; Cheng Zhu; Deshea L Harris; Kathryn Colby; Nancy C Joyce Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Xiaolin Zhang; Robert P Igo; Jeremy Fondran; V Vinod Mootha; Matt Oliva; Kristin Hammersmith; Alan Sugar; Jonathan H Lass; Sudha K Iyengar Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kishore Reddy Katikireddy; Tomas L White; Taiga Miyajima; Shivakumar Vasanth; Duna Raoof; Yuming Chen; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price; Ula V Jurkunas Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2017-12-30 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Huan Meng; Mario Matthaei; Narendrakumar Ramanan; Rhonda Grebe; Shukti Chakravarti; Caroline L Speck; Martha Kimos; Neeraj Vij; Charles G Eberhart; Albert S Jun Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Stephan Ong Tone; Matthew James Bruha; Myriam Böhm; Christina Prescott; Ula Jurkunas Journal: Can J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 1.882