PURPOSE: To compare the relative expression of peroxiredoxin (Prx) proteins in normal human corneal endothelium with endothelium in corneas affected by Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) and between normal human endothelium and epithelial/stromal tissue. METHODS: Human corneal endothelial cell-Descemet's membrane (HCEC-DM) complexes from normal and FED corneal buttons were dissected from the epithelium/stroma. For proteomic analysis, HCEC-DM protein extracts were separated by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Relative differences in protein spot density was analyzed. Proteins of interest, including Prx isoforms, were identified by MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight) mass spectrometry. Western blot analysis compared the relative expression of Prx isoforms in normal and FED endothelium and between normal endothelium and normal epithelium/stroma. Expression of Prx-2 mRNA was compared by using real-time PCR. RESULTS: Proteomic analysis identified differences in the relative expression of Prx isoforms between normal and FED endothelium. Western blot analysis confirmed that expression of Prx-2, -3, and -5 was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in FED cells. Normal HCECs expressed significantly (P < 0.05) higher levels of Prx-2 and -3 than did the epithelium/stroma. Expression of Prx-5 was not significantly different (P > 0.05) in the endothelium versus the epithelium/stroma. Real-time PCR analysis revealed that Prx-2 mRNA was significantly decreased (P = 0.027) in FED samples. CONCLUSIONS: Prx proteins were identified in human corneal endothelium. The fact that Prx-2 and -3 were expressed at significantly higher levels in HCEC-DM compared with the epithelium/stroma reflects the different physiologic activities of individual corneal cell types. Significantly decreased expression of Prx-2, -3, and -5 in FED may suggest an alteration in the ability of endothelial cells to withstand oxidant-induced damage and may be closely related to the pathogenesis of this disease.
PURPOSE: To compare the relative expression of peroxiredoxin (Prx) proteins in normal human corneal endothelium with endothelium in corneas affected by Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) and between normal human endothelium and epithelial/stromal tissue. METHODS:Human corneal endothelial cell-Descemet's membrane (HCEC-DM) complexes from normal and FED corneal buttons were dissected from the epithelium/stroma. For proteomic analysis, HCEC-DM protein extracts were separated by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Relative differences in protein spot density was analyzed. Proteins of interest, including Prx isoforms, were identified by MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight) mass spectrometry. Western blot analysis compared the relative expression of Prx isoforms in normal and FED endothelium and between normal endothelium and normal epithelium/stroma. Expression of Prx-2 mRNA was compared by using real-time PCR. RESULTS: Proteomic analysis identified differences in the relative expression of Prx isoforms between normal and FED endothelium. Western blot analysis confirmed that expression of Prx-2, -3, and -5 was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in FED cells. Normal HCECs expressed significantly (P < 0.05) higher levels of Prx-2 and -3 than did the epithelium/stroma. Expression of Prx-5 was not significantly different (P > 0.05) in the endothelium versus the epithelium/stroma. Real-time PCR analysis revealed that Prx-2 mRNA was significantly decreased (P = 0.027) in FED samples. CONCLUSIONS: Prx proteins were identified in human corneal endothelium. The fact that Prx-2 and -3 were expressed at significantly higher levels in HCEC-DM compared with the epithelium/stroma reflects the different physiologic activities of individual corneal cell types. Significantly decreased expression of Prx-2, -3, and -5 in FED may suggest an alteration in the ability of endothelial cells to withstand oxidant-induced damage and may be closely related to the pathogenesis of this disease.
Authors: John D Gottsch; Amanda L Bowers; Elliott H Margulies; Gerami D Seitzman; Sean W Kim; Saurabh Saha; Albert S Jun; Walter J Stark; Sammy H Liu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Y Zhou; K H Kok; A C Chun; C M Wong; H W Wu; M C Lin; P C Fung; H Kung; D Y Jin Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2000-02-24 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Rajeev Buddi; Brian Lin; Shari R Atilano; Nadia C Zorapapel; M Cristina Kenney; Donald J Brown Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: Tetsuya Toyono; Tomohiko Usui; Guadalupe Villarreal; Laura Kallay; Mario Matthaei; Lucas M M Vianna; Angela Y Zhu; Masahiko Kuroda; Shiro Amano; Albert S Jun Journal: Cornea Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Mario Matthaei; Jianfei Hu; Laura Kallay; Charles G Eberhart; Claus Cursiefen; Jiang Qian; Eva-Maria Lackner; Albert S Jun Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kishore Reddy Katikireddy; Tomas L White; Taiga Miyajima; Shivakumar Vasanth; Duna Raoof; Yuming Chen; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price; Ula V Jurkunas Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2017-12-30 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Mario Matthaei; Angela Y Zhu; Laura Kallay; Charles G Eberhart; Claus Cursiefen; Albert S Jun Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-10-11 Impact factor: 3.467