Literature DB >> 31564347

Regional variability in corneal endothelial cell density between guttae and non-guttae areas in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Stephan Ong Tone1, Matthew James Bruha2, Myriam Böhm1, Christina Prescott3, Ula Jurkunas4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the regional variability of corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) between guttae and non-guttae areas in subjects with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) using non-contact specular microscopy and confocal microscopy.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review from 2009 to 2014 at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifteen eyes of 73 subjects with FECD.
METHODS: Subjects with FECD underwent same-day specular and confocal microscopy in the same eye. Clinical stage of disease was documented on the day of image acquisition. Regional variability of ECD associated with guttae and non-guttae areas was assessed. Manual endothelial cell counts were performed.
RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of subjects had high quality endothelial images by both specular and confocal microscopy. Of these subjects, 83% were classified clinically as early-stage FECD. There was a significant association between stage of disease and the ability to obtain high quality specular images (χ2; p = 0.0012). There was no difference in mean ECD derived from specular (1363 ± 594 cells/mm2) or confocal (1391 ± 493 cells/mm2; p = 0.75) images. There was a statistically significant decrease of 31.8 ± 21.7% in mean ECD in areas surrounding guttae (1296 ± 560 cells/mm2) compared to non-guttae areas (1926 ± 674 cells/mm2; p < 0.0001) as determined by confocal microscopy.
CONCLUSION: These findings support confocal microscopy as an alternative to specular microscopy for evaluating the corneal endothelium of patients with FECD, especially those with advanced disease. Confocal microscopy also revealed regional differences in ECD in guttae and non-guttae areas in patients with FECD.
Copyright © 2019 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31564347      PMCID: PMC6776238          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  28 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Association of the Gutta-Induced Microenvironment With Corneal Endothelial Cell Behavior and Demise in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Viridiana Kocaba; Kishore Reddy Katikireddy; Ilene Gipson; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price; Ula V Jurkunas
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Increased clusterin expression in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Ula V Jurkunas; Maya S Bitar; Ian Rawe; Deshea L Harris; Kathryn Colby; Nancy C Joyce
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  The pathophysiology of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy--a review of molecular and cellular insights.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Dipika V Patel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Quantitative regional differences in corneal endothelial abnormalities in the central and peripheral zones in Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Hisataka Fujimoto; Naoyuki Maeda; Takeshi Soma; Yoshinori Oie; Shizuka Koh; Motokazu Tsujikawa; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Objective assessment of the corneal endothelium in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; Lori A Bachman; Katrina M Kane; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Fuchs' corneal dystrophy. A clinicopathologic study of the variation in corneal edema.

Authors:  M M Rodrigues; J H Krachmer; J Hackett; R Gaskins; A Halkias
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Evidence of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Ula V Jurkunas; Maya S Bitar; Toshinari Funaki; Behrooz Azizi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: subjective grading versus objective grading based on the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio.

Authors:  Daniel J Repp; David O Hodge; Keith H Baratz; Jay W McLaren; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  In vivo confocal microscopy of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  R K Mustonen; M B McDonald; S Srivannaboon; A L Tan; M W Doubrava; C K Kim
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: The vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis.

Authors:  Stephan Ong Tone; Viridiana Kocaba; Myriam Böhm; Adam Wylegala; Tomas L White; Ula V Jurkunas
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 21.198

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.