Literature DB >> 22057943

An iterative self-refining and self-evaluating approach for protein model quality estimation.

Zheng Wang1, Jianlin Cheng.   

Abstract

Evaluating or predicting the quality of protein models (i.e., predicted protein tertiary structures) without knowing their native structures is important for selecting and appropriately using protein models. We describe an iterative approach that improves the performances of protein Model Quality Assurance Programs (MQAPs). Given the initial quality scores of a list of models assigned by a MQAP, the method iteratively refines the scores until the ranking of the models does not change. We applied the method to the model quality assessment data generated by 30 MQAPs during the Eighth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. To various degrees, our method increased the average correlation between predicted and real quality scores of 25 out of 30 MQAPs and reduced the average loss (i.e., the difference between the top ranked model and the best model) for 28 MQAPs. Particularly, for MQAPs with low average correlations (<0.4), the correlation can be increased by several times. Similar experiments conducted on the CASP9 MQAPs also demonstrated the effectiveness of the method. Our method is a hybrid method that combines the original method of a MQAP and the pair-wise comparison clustering method. It can achieve a high accuracy similar to a full pair-wise clustering method, but with much less computation time when evaluating hundreds of models. Furthermore, without knowing native structures, the iterative refining method can evaluate the performance of a MQAP by analyzing its model quality predictions.
Copyright © 2011 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057943      PMCID: PMC3323789          DOI: 10.1002/pro.764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  23 in total

1.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ginalski; Arne Elofsson; Daniel Fischer; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures.

Authors:  Adam Zemla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

6.  OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Authors:  Yinghao Wu; Mingyang Lu; Mingzhi Chen; Jialin Li; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

8.  Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Michele Ceriani; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

9.  Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server.

Authors:  Liam J McGuffin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

10.  Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition.

Authors:  Liam J McGuffin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Jianlin Cheng; Jilong Li; Zheng Wang; Jesse Eickholt; Xin Deng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2.

Authors:  Arjun Ray; Erik Lindahl; Björn Wallner
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Benchmarking Deep Networks for Predicting Residue-Specific Quality of Individual Protein Models in CASP11.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Yiheng Wang; Jesse Eickholt; Zheng Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.