Literature DB >> 19585661

Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server.

Liam J McGuffin1.   

Abstract

The development of effective methods for predicting the quality of three-dimensional (3D) models is fundamentally important for the success of tertiary structure (TS) prediction strategies. Since CASP7, the Quality Assessment (QA) category has existed to gauge the ability of various model quality assessment programs (MQAPs) at predicting the relative quality of individual 3D models. For the CASP8 experiment, automated predictions were submitted in the QA category using two methods from the ModFOLD server-ModFOLD version 1.1 and ModFOLDclust. ModFOLD version 1.1 is a single-model machine learning based method, which was used for automated predictions of global model quality (QMODE1). ModFOLDclust is a simple clustering based method, which was used for automated predictions of both global and local quality (QMODE2). In addition, manual predictions of model quality were made using ModFOLD version 2.0--an experimental method that combines the scores from ModFOLDclust and ModFOLD v1.1. Predictions from the ModFOLDclust method were the most successful of the three in terms of the global model quality, whilst the ModFOLD v1.1 method was comparable in performance to other single-model based methods. In addition, the ModFOLDclust method performed well at predicting the per-residue, or local, model quality scores. Predictions of the per-residue errors in our own 3D models, selected using the ModFOLD v2.0 method, were also the most accurate compared with those from other methods. All of the MQAPs described are publicly accessible via the ModFOLD server at: http://www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/ModFOLD/. The methods are also freely available to download from: http://www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/downloads/. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19585661     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  17 in total

1.  An iterative self-refining and self-evaluating approach for protein model quality estimation.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Recursive protein modeling: a divide and conquer strategy for Protein Structure Prediction and its case study in CASP9.

Authors:  Jianlin Cheng; Jesse Eickholt; Zheng Wang; Xin Deng
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.122

Review 3.  A comprehensive overview of computational protein disorder prediction methods.

Authors:  Xin Deng; Jesse Eickholt; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2011-08-26

4.  Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

5.  MUFOLD-WQA: A new selective consensus method for quality assessment in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Qingguo Wang; Kittinun Vantasin; Dong Xu; Yi Shang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

6.  Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation.

Authors:  Matan Kalman; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11.

Authors:  Renzhi Cao; Debswapna Bhattacharya; Badri Adhikari; Jilong Li; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-29

8.  Assessment of the assessment: evaluation of the model quality estimates in CASP10.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Alessandro Barbato; Krzysztof Fidelis; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-31

9.  FunFOLD: an improved automated method for the prediction of ligand binding residues using 3D models of proteins.

Authors:  Daniel B Roche; Stuart J Tetchner; Liam J McGuffin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  The ModFOLD4 server for the quality assessment of 3D protein models.

Authors:  Liam J McGuffin; Maria T Buenavista; Daniel B Roche
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.