Literature DB >> 17894353

Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.

Björn Wallner1, Arne Elofsson.   

Abstract

The ability to rank and select the best model is important in protein structure prediction. Model Quality Assessment Programs (MQAPs) are programs developed to perform this task. They can be divided into three categories based on the information they use. Consensus based methods use the similarity to other models, structure-based methods use features calculated from the structure and evolutionary based methods use the sequence similarity between a model and a template. These methods can be trained to predict the overall global quality of a model, that is, how much a model is likely to differ from the native structure. The methods can also be trained to pinpoint which local regions in a model are likely to be incorrect. In CASP7, we participated with three predictors of global and four of local quality using information from the three categories described above. The result shows that the MQAP using consensus, Pcons, was significantly better at predicting both global and local quality compared with MQAPs using only structure or sequence based information. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17894353     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  39 in total

1.  An iterative self-refining and self-evaluating approach for protein model quality estimation.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  The evaluation of protein structure prediction results.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Alejandro Giorgetti; Domenico Raimondo; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Applying undertaker cost functions to model quality assessment.

Authors:  John Archie; Kevin Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-05-15

4.  Model quality assessment using distance constraints from alignments.

Authors:  Martin Paluszewski; Kevin Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-05-15

5.  Applying Undertaker to quality assessment.

Authors:  John G Archie; Martin Paluszewski; Kevin Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

Review 6.  Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models.

Authors:  Daniel A Keedy; Christopher J Williams; Jeffrey J Headd; W Bryan Arendall; Vincent B Chen; Gary J Kapral; Robert A Gillespie; Jeremy N Block; Adam Zemla; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

8.  Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling.

Authors:  Per Larsson; Björn Wallner; Erik Lindahl; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Michael Künzli; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Torsten Schwede; Silvio Ce Tosatto
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.