Literature DB >> 27200394

Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, Comparing Patients and Physicians.

Michiel Gjs Hageman1, Jeroen K Bossen1, Valentin Neuhaus1, Chaitanya S Mudgal1, David Ring1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As part of the process of developing a decision aid for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, we were interested in the level of 'decisional conflict' of hand surgeons and patients with CTS. This study addresses the null hypothesis that there is no difference between surgeon and patient decisional conflict with respect to test and treatment options for CTS. Secondary analyses assess the impact of patient and physician demographics and the strength of the patient-physician relationship on decisional conflict.
METHODS: One-hundred-twenty-three observers of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and 84 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome completed a survey regarding the Decisional Conflict Scale. Patients also filled out the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Patient Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9).
RESULTS: On average, patients had significantly greater decision conflict and scored higher on most subscales of the decisional conflict scale than hand surgeons. Factors associated with greater decision conflict were specific hand surgeon, less self-efficacy (confidence that one can achieve one's goals in spite of pain), and higher PDRQ (relationship between patient and doctor). Surgeons from Europe have--on average--significantly more decision conflict than surgeons in the United States of America.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CTS have more decision conflict than hand surgeons. Decision aids might help narrow this gap in decisional conflict.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Decision aids; Hand surgery; Shared decision makin

Year:  2016        PMID: 27200394      PMCID: PMC4852042     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  16 in total

1.  Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program.

Authors:  E A Phelan; R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; J N Weinstein; M A Ciol; W Kreuter; J F Howe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Evidence-based persuasion: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  David Shaw; Bernice Elger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  James Slover; Jennifer Shue; Karl Koenig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  V Goel; C A Sawka; E C Thiel; E H Gort; A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study.

Authors:  Ali Asghari; Michael K Nicholas
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Decision making in depression: differences in decisional conflict between healthy and depressed individuals.

Authors:  Annette van Randenborgh; Renate de Jong-Meyer; Joachim Hüffmeier
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

8.  Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation.

Authors:  Ruth E Davis; Gina Dolan; Sue Thomas; Christine Atwell; Donna Mead; Sarah Nehammer; Laurie Moseley; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Christina M Van der Feltz-Cornelis; Patricia Van Oppen; Harm W J Van Marwijk; Edwin De Beurs; Richard Van Dyck
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.238

10.  Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer.

Authors:  A Vodermaier; C Caspari; J Koehm; S Kahlert; N Ditsch; M Untch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mini-open carpal tunnel release: technique, feasibility and clinical outcome compared to the conventional procedure in a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Angelika M Schwarz; Georg Lipnik; Gloria M Hohenberger; Aurel Krauss; Michael Plecko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.