Sari Lieberman1,2, Ariela Tomer1,2, Avi Ben-Chetrit1,3, Oded Olsha4, Shalom Strano5, Rachel Beeri2, Sivan Koka2, Hila Fridman2, Karen Djemal6, Itzhak Glick7, Todd Zalut8,9, Shlomo Segev10, Miri Sklair11,12, Bella Kaufman12,13, Amnon Lahad1,14, Aviad Raz15, Ephrat Levy-Lahad1,2. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 2. Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 3. Women's Health Center, Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem, Israel. 4. Surgical Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 5. The Comprehensive Breast Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 6. Terem Family Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 7. Efrat Emergency Medical Center, Efrat, Israel. 8. Terem Clinic, Modi'in, Israel. 9. Department of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 10. Institute of Medical Screening, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. 11. Department of Radiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. 12. Sackler Faculty of Mediciine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel. 13. Institute of Oncology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. 14. Department of Family Medicine, Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem, Israel. 15. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Population screening of three common BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) apparently fulfills screening criteria. We compared streamlined BRCA screening via self-referral with proactive recruitment in medical settings. METHODS: Unaffected AJ, age ≥25 years without known familial mutations, were either self-referred or recruiter-enrolled. Before testing, participants received written information and self-reported family history (FH). After testing, both non-carriers with significant FH and carriers received in-person genetic counseling. Psychosocial questionnaires were self-administered 1 week and 6 months after enrollment. RESULTS: Of 1,771 participants, 58% were recruiter-enrolled and 42% were self-referred. Screening uptake was 67%. Recruited enrollees were older (mean age 54 vs. 48, P < 0.001) and had less suggestive FH (23 vs. 33%, P < 0.001). Of 32 (1.8%) carriers identified, 40% had no significant FH. Post-test counseling compliance was 100% for carriers and 89% for non-carrier women with FH. All groups expressed high satisfaction (>90%). At 6 months, carriers had significantly increased distress and anxiety, greater knowledge, and similar satisfaction; 90% of participants would recommend general AJ BRCA screening. CONCLUSION: Streamlined BRCA screening results in high uptake, very high satisfaction, and no excess psychosocial harm. Proactive recruitment captured older women less selected for FH. Further research is necessary to target younger women and assess other populations.Genet Med advance online publication 08 December 2016.
PURPOSE: Population screening of three common BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) apparently fulfills screening criteria. We compared streamlined BRCA screening via self-referral with proactive recruitment in medical settings. METHODS: Unaffected AJ, age ≥25 years without known familial mutations, were either self-referred or recruiter-enrolled. Before testing, participants received written information and self-reported family history (FH). After testing, both non-carriers with significant FH and carriers received in-person genetic counseling. Psychosocial questionnaires were self-administered 1 week and 6 months after enrollment. RESULTS: Of 1,771 participants, 58% were recruiter-enrolled and 42% were self-referred. Screening uptake was 67%. Recruited enrollees were older (mean age 54 vs. 48, P < 0.001) and had less suggestive FH (23 vs. 33%, P < 0.001). Of 32 (1.8%) carriers identified, 40% had no significant FH. Post-test counseling compliance was 100% for carriers and 89% for non-carrier women with FH. All groups expressed high satisfaction (>90%). At 6 months, carriers had significantly increased distress and anxiety, greater knowledge, and similar satisfaction; 90% of participants would recommend general AJ BRCA screening. CONCLUSION: Streamlined BRCA screening results in high uptake, very high satisfaction, and no excess psychosocial harm. Proactive recruitment captured older women less selected for FH. Further research is necessary to target younger women and assess other populations.Genet Med advance online publication 08 December 2016.
Authors: Kelly A Metcalfe; Nida Mian; Melissa Enmore; Aletta Poll; Marcia Llacuachaqui; Sonia Nanda; Ping Sun; Kevin S Hughes; Steven A Narod Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kathleen A Calzone; Sheila A Prindiville; Oxana Jourkiv; Jean Jenkins; Maria DeCarvalho; Dawn B Wallerstedt; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Peter W Soballe; Stan Lipkowitz; Pamela Klein; Ilan R Kirsch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Holmes-Rovner; J Kroll; N Schmitt; D R Rovner; M L Breer; M L Rothert; G Padonu; G Talarczyk Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 1996 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Kristi D Graves; Patti Vegella; Elizabeth A Poggi; Beth N Peshkin; Angie Tong; Claudine Isaacs; Clinton Finch; Scott Kelly; Kathryn L Taylor; George Luta; Marc D Schwartz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: C Lerman; S Narod; K Schulman; C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; G Bonney; K Gold; B Trock; D Main; J Lynch; C Fulmore; C Snyder; S J Lemon; T Conway; P Tonin; G Lenoir; H Lynch Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-06-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tammy M Beran; Annette L Stanton; Lorna Kwan; Joyce Seldon; Julienne E Bower; Andrea Vodermaier; Patricia A Ganz Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2008-09-12
Authors: Kelly M Morgan; Jada G Hamilton; Heather Symecko; Daniella Kamara; Colby Jenkins; Jenny Lester; Kelsey Spielman; Lydia E Pace; Camila Gabriel; Jeffrey D Levin; Prince Rainier Tejada; Anthony Braswell; Vanessa Marcell; Temima Wildman; Bryan Devolder; Robin Camhi Baum; Jeremy N Block; Yuri Fesko; Kylin Boehler; Victoria Howell; Jacob Heitler; Mark E Robson; Katherine L Nathanson; Nadine Tung; Beth Y Karlan; Susan M Domchek; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 8.864
Authors: Melanie W Hardy; Beth N Peshkin; Esther Rose; Mary Kathleen Ladd; Savannah Binion; Mara Tynan; Colleen M McBride; Karen A Grinzaid; Marc D Schwartz Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2022-04-29
Authors: Ranjit Manchanda; Li Sun; Shreeya Patel; Olivia Evans; Janneke Wilschut; Ana Carolina De Freitas Lopes; Faiza Gaba; Adam Brentnall; Stephen Duffy; Bin Cui; Patricia Coelho De Soarez; Zakir Husain; John Hopper; Zia Sadique; Asima Mukhopadhyay; Li Yang; Johannes Berkhof; Rosa Legood Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Jeanna M McCuaig; Susan Randall Armel; Melanie Care; Alexandra Volenik; Raymond H Kim; Kelly A Metcalfe Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Angela R Solano; Natalia C Liria; Fernanda S Jalil; Daniela M Faggionato; Pablo G Mele; Alejandra Mampel; Florencia C Cardoso; Ernesto J Podesta Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 6.244