Literature DB >> 22053975

Evaluation of the implanted cochlear implant electrode by CT scanning with three-dimensional reconstruction.

Wei-Jia Kong1, Hua-Mao Cheng, Hui Ma, Yan-Jun Wang, Ping Han.   

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography (CT) scan with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the inner ear provides a more accurate image of the relationship of the electrode within the cochlear canal, with direct demonstration of electrode insertion depth in the cochlea in comparison with X-ray plain film.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the value of spiral CT scans with 3D reconstruction in determining the insertion site and depth of implanted cochlear implant electrodes.
METHODS: A total of 172 cochlear implant recipients were involved in this study. The implanted electrodes of all patients were examined by X-ray plain film, and 157 cochlear recipients were examined by spiral CT scans with axial 1 mm image slices. The data from the CT scans were transferred to a workstation for 3D reconstruction (direct volume rendering) of the inner ear. The pseudocolor technique was used to display the electrode.
RESULTS: The insertion depth of the electrode could be evaluated indirectly by the X-ray plain film. In contrast, the stereoscopic images from a CT scan with 3D reconstruction of the inner ear demonstrated the shape, position, and insertion depth of the electrode more accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22053975     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2011.626794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  7 in total

1.  Correlation between histologic and radiographic reconstruction of intracochlear electrode position in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Meng-Yu Zhu; Hugh D Curtin; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Scanning electrochemical microscopy as a novel proximity sensor for atraumatic cochlear implant insertion.

Authors:  H Watanabe; J Velmurugan; M V Mirkin; M A Svirsky; A K Lalwani; R R Llinas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Validating a New Tablet-based Tool in the Determination of Cochlear Implant Angular Insertion Depth.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; I Todt; A Ernst; G Rademacher; S Mutze; S Göricke; M Schlamann; R Ramalingam; S Lang; F Christov; D Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Sidharth V Puram; Max Smith; Barbara S Herrmann; Mary E Cunnane; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Measurement of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position From Intraoperative Post-insertion Skull Radiographs: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Maja Svrakic; David R Friedmann; Phillip M Berman; Adam J Davis; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Assessing Cochlear Implant Insertion Angle From an Intraoperative X-ray Using a Rotating 3D Helical Scala Tympani Model.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Michael W Canfarotta; Nicholas J Thompson; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Sarah E Hodge; Jenna Baker; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.619

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.