Literature DB >> 22048863

Much more than a gene: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, reproductive choices and family life.

Catherine Dekeuwer1, Simone Bateman.   

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study that investigates the way in which carriers of a mutation on the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene, associated with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer, make their reproductive decisions. Using semi-structured interviews, the study explored the way in which these persons reflected on the acceptability of taking the risk of transmitting this mutation to the next generation, the arguments they used in favor or against taking that risk, and in the light of these arguments, their opinion on the acceptability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as a reproductive option. The findings suggest that when carriers are planning to have a(nother) child, they are mainly concerned by the risk of transmitting 'much more than a gene': essentially painful experiences not only with respect to health, such as undergoing cancer surveillance or combatting one's own illness, but also with regards to family life, such as witnessing the illness and death of a close relative, encountering difficulties in finding a partner or reconsidering one's plans to have a family. As for opinions concerning the acceptability of PGD as a reproductive option, opinions about personal recourse were varied but all expressed the understanding that PGD should be made available to those persons who consider it their best option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22048863     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-011-9361-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  14 in total

1.  Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; R Eeles; A Ardern-Jones; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Stigmatization and male identity: Norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Målfrid Råheim; Nina Oyen; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Genetic testing for hereditary cancers: the impact of gender on interest, uptake and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Lori d'Agincourt-Canning; Patricia Baird
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  BRCA carriers' thoughts on risk management in relation to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and childbearing: when too many choices are just as difficult as none.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Sharon Tollin; Cheryl A Miree; Devin Murphy; Bethanne Bower; Celso Silva
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Men's decision-making about predictive BRCA1/2 testing: the role of family.

Authors:  N Hallowell; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; C Foster; A Lucassen; C Moynihan; M Watson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Guilt, blame and responsibility: men's understanding of their role in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their family.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Audrey Arden-Jones; Ros Eeles; Claire Foster; Anneke Lucassen; Clare Moynihan; Maggie Watson
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2006-11

7.  High risk men's perceptions of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Cheryl A Miree; Ji-Hyun Lee; Xiuhua Zhao; Susan Friedman; Susan Yi; James Mayer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Cancer risk reduction and reproductive concerns in female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Ashley D Staton; Allison W Kurian; Kristin Cobb; Meredith A Mills; James M Ford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Lindsey M King; Cheryl A Miree; Sue Friedman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Cancer risks among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  E Levy-Lahad; E Friedman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reproductive Decision-Making in MMR Mutation Carriers After Results Disclosure: Impact of Psychological Status in Childbearing Options.

Authors:  Jacqueline Duffour; Audrey Combes; Evelyne Crapez; Florence Boissière-Michot; Frédéric Bibeau; Pierre Senesse; Marc Ychou; Julie Courraud; Hélène de Forges; Lise Roca
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Reproductive Decision-Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Laura DiGiovanni; Chan Voong; Susan M Domchek; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Our genes, our selves: hereditary breast cancer and biological citizenship in Norway.

Authors:  Kari Nyheim Solbrække; Håvard Søiland; Kirsten Lode; Birgitta Haga Gripsrud
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-03

4.  Familial breast cancer: less emotional distress in adult daughters if they provide emotional support to their affected mother.

Authors:  Andrea Vodermaier; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Thereasa A Rich; Mei Liu; Carol J Etzel; Sarah A Bannon; Maureen E Mork; Kaylene Ready; Devki S Saraiya; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Nancy D Perrier; Karen H Lu; Banu K Arun; Terri L Woodard; Leslie R Schover; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  On prenatal diagnosis and the decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy in France: a clinical ethics study of unknown moral territories.

Authors:  Marie Gaille
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-09

7.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Reproductive Endocrinologists' Utilization of Genetic Counselors for Oncofertility and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Treatment of BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Allison L Goetsch; Catherine Wicklund; Marla L Clayman; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Exploring the preferences of involved health professionals regarding the implementation of an online decision aid to support couples during reproductive decision-making in hereditary cancer: a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Kelly Reumkens; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Liesbeth A D M van Osch
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Reproductive Decision Support: Preferences and Needs of Couples at Risk for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Geneticists.

Authors:  Kelly Reumkens; A J G van Oudheusden; J J G Gietel-Habets; M H E Tummers; C E M de Die-Smulders; L A D M van Osch
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.