Literature DB >> 22401817

Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.

Ami R Amini1, Douglas J Adams, Cato T Laurencin, Syam P Nukavarapu.   

Abstract

Large-area or critical-sized bone defects pose a serious challenge in orthopedic surgery, as all current treatment options present with shortcomings. Bone tissue engineering offers a more promising alternative treatment strategy. However, this approach requires mechanically stable scaffolds that support homogenous bone formation throughout the scaffold thickness. Despite advances in scaffold fabrication, current scaffold-based techniques are unable to support uniform, three-dimensional bone regeneration, and are limited to only the scaffold surface in vitro and in vivo. This is mainly because of inadequate scaffold pore sizes (<200 μm) and accessible pore volume, and the associated limited oxygen diffusion and vascular invasion. In this study, we have adopted a method combining microsphere-sintering and porogen-leaching techniques to fabricate scaffolds with an increased accessible pore volume. Of the scaffolds developed, moderately porous poly(85 lactide-co-15 glycolide) (PLGA) microsphere scaffolds were selected as most advantageous, since they retain mechanical strength in the range of human cancellous bone and display a significantly higher accessible pore volume, which is attributed to an increased percentage of larger pores (i.e., size range 200-600 μm). Unlike control scaffolds with a limited pore size and an accessible pore volume, moderately porous scaffolds displayed increased oxygen diffusion, pre-osteoblast cell infiltration, proliferation, and survival throughout the entire scaffold. Furthermore, moderately porous PLGA microsphere scaffolds displayed enhanced and homogenous mineralization in vitro. Since these newly designed moderately porous scaffolds are weight bearing, are fully osteoconductive, and have the ability to support vascularization, they may serve as effective scaffolds for large-area bone defect repair/regeneration. In addition, this study demonstrates the ability to modulate scaffold porosity and, in turn, to develop oxygen tension-controlled matrices that are effective for large-area bone regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22401817      PMCID: PMC5802344          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  55 in total

1.  Tissue-engineered bone regeneration.

Authors:  H Petite; V Viateau; W Bensaïd; A Meunier; C de Pollak; M Bourguignon; K Oudina; L Sedel; G Guillemin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; C Zhu; D R Lanctot; C M Agrawal; X Wang
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2000-08

Review 3.  Bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Cato Laurencin; Yusuf Khan; Saadiq F El-Amin
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Macroporous and nanofibrous polymer scaffolds and polymer/bone-like apatite composite scaffolds generated by sugar spheres.

Authors:  Guobao Wei; Peter X Ma
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  An essential requirement for osteoclasts in refined bone-like tissue reconstruction in vitro.

Authors:  Daqing Han; Qiqing Zhang
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 1.538

6.  Hypoxia in static and dynamic 3D culture systems for tissue engineering of bone.

Authors:  Elias Volkmer; Inga Drosse; Sven Otto; Achim Stangelmayer; Michael Stengele; Bobby Cherian Kallukalam; Wolf Mutschler; Matthias Schieker
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Ectopic induction of cartilage and bone by water-soluble proteins from bovine bone using a polyanhydride delivery vehicle.

Authors:  P A Lucas; C Laurencin; G T Syftestad; A Domb; V M Goldberg; A I Caplan; R Langer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-07

8.  The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo.

Authors:  Bai Feng; Zhang Jinkang; Wang Zhen; Lu Jianxi; Chang Jiang; Liu Jian; Meng Guolin; Dong Xin
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 9.  Evolution of bone transplantation: molecular, cellular and tissue strategies to engineer human bone.

Authors:  M J Yaszemski; R G Payne; W C Hayes; R Langer; A G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  27 in total

1.  Oxygen Tension-Controlled Matrices with Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Cells for Vascularized Bone Regeneration In Vivo.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Thomas O Xu; Ramaswamy M Chidambaram; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Xiaoyan Tang; Shalini V Gohil; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Emergence of the Stem Cell Secretome in Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Leila Daneshmandi; Shiv Shah; Tahereh Jafari; Maumita Bhattacharjee; Deandra Momah; Nikoo Saveh-Shemshaki; Kevin W-H Lo; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 4.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

5.  Micro-Nanostructures of Cellulose-Collagen for Critical Sized Bone Defect Healing.

Authors:  Aja Aravamudhan; Daisy M Ramos; Jonathan Nip; Ivo Kalajzic; Sangamesh G Kumbar
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.979

6.  Noninvasive Absolute Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Oxygen Imaging for the Assessment of Tissue Graft Oxygenation.

Authors:  Mrignayani Kotecha; Boris Epel; Sriram Ravindran; Deborah Dorcemus; Syam Nukavarapu; Howard Halpern
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Self-neutralizing PLGA/magnesium composites as novel biomaterials for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Thomas O Xu; Hyun S Kim; Tyler Stahl; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.715

8.  Subcritical CO2 sintering of microspheres of different polymeric materials to fabricate scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Manjari Bhamidipati; BanuPriya Sridharan; Aaron M Scurto; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.328

9.  Oxygen-tension controlled matrices for enhanced osteogenic cell survival and performance.

Authors:  A R Amini; S P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.