Literature DB >> 22038902

Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long-tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis).

Jorg J M Massen1, Lisette M Van Den Berg, Berry M Spruijt, Elisabeth H M Sterck.   

Abstract

Social animals may employ evolved implicit rules to maintain a balance between cooperation and competition. Inequity aversion (IA), the aversive reaction to an unequal distribution of resources, is considered such a rule to avoid exploitation between cooperating individuals. Recent studies have revealed the presence of IA in several nonhuman species. In addition, it has been shown that an effort is crucial for this behavior to occur in animals. Moreover, IA may well depend on the partner's identity. Although dominant individuals typically monopolize food, subordinate individuals obtain less preferred food and usually do not protest. Furthermore, "friends" may pay less attention to equity than "nonfriends." We tested whether long-tailed macaques show IA with different cost-benefit ratios. In addition, we determined whether IA depends on relationship quality (RQ). Dominant subjects expressed IA only when a small effort was required. At a very large effort, however, long-tailed macaques did not show IA, possibly owing to bottom effects on the number of rewards they aim to receive. Moreover, and contrary to our predictions, an individual's inequity response was similar when tested with a "friend" or a "nonfriend." Therefore, we conclude that long-tailed macaques show IA only in conditions of moderate effort, yet that IA seems independent of RQ. Furthermore, IA may not be domain specific. Altogether, IA may be a trait present in all species that habitually cooperate, independent of their social organization.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22038902     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.21014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  20 in total

1.  Rudimentary empathy in macaques' social decision-making.

Authors:  Sebastien Ballesta; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Personality influences responses to inequity and contrast in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Lydia M Hopper; Sean Richey; Hani D Freeman; Catherine F Talbot; Samuel D Gosling; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Inequity aversion strategies between marmosets are influenced by partner familiarity and sex but not oxytocin.

Authors:  Aaryn C Mustoe; April M Harnisch; Benjamin Hochfelder; Jon Cavanaugh; Jeffrey A French
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Evolution of responses to (un)fairness.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inequity Aversion Negatively Affects Tolerance and Contact-Seeking Behaviours towards Partner and Experimenter.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Jennifer L Essler; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Friederike Range
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game.

Authors:  Ryan Sigmundson; Mathieu S Stribos; Roy Hammer; Julia Herzele; Lena S Pflüger; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  New Caledonian crows rapidly solve a collaborative problem without cooperative cognition.

Authors:  Sarah A Jelbert; Puja J Singh; Russell D Gray; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Different responses to reward comparisons by three primate species.

Authors:  Hani D Freeman; Jennifer Sullivan; Lydia M Hopper; Catherine F Talbot; Andrea N Holmes; Nancy Schultz-Darken; Lawrence E Williams; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.