Literature DB >> 25722495

Personality influences responses to inequity and contrast in chimpanzees.

Sarah F Brosnan1, Lydia M Hopper2, Sean Richey3, Hani D Freeman2, Catherine F Talbot4, Samuel D Gosling5, Susan P Lambeth6, Steven J Schapiro6.   

Abstract

Several species besides humans respond negatively to inequity (i.e. receiving a less preferred outcome as compared to a social partner). Among primates, the taxon for which inequity responses have been most comprehensively studied, there are large individual differences in responses that have, thus far, not been well explained by demographic features such as sex, rank and age. Recent evidence shows that individuals' personalities are important in explaining differences in behavioural outcomes in other contexts. Thus, in the current study, we explored whether personality was associated with chimpanzees' responses to both inequity and contrast (i.e. receiving less than anticipated). Chimpanzees were paired with multiple members of their social groups. These pairs alternated trading a token to receive food rewards that either differed from what their partner received (inequity condition) or from what was initially offered (contrast condition) and we compared their responses to a control in which both subjects were offered and received the same reward for trading the token. We predicted that both personality and the quality and length of the pairs' relationship would influence subjects' reactions to unequal outcomes, as measured by their refusal to exchange tokens. The quality of subjects' relationships, based on a weighted average of grooming, contact and proximity, did not correlate with refusals to exchange, whereas pairs that had lived together longer were less likely to refuse in the contrast condition than were pairs that had lived together for less time. Considering personality, some of the dimensions influenced responses to both inequity and contrast similarly, but the more 'social' personality dimensions ('extraversion' and 'agreeableness') were more strongly correlated with sensitivity to inequity. These results highlight the importance of considering individual differences, including personality, when evaluating responses in cognitive and behavioural tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast effect; inequity; personality; social comparison; social relationship

Year:  2015        PMID: 25722495      PMCID: PMC4337034          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  33 in total

Review 1.  From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research?

Authors:  S D Gosling
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Recognition of other individuals' social relationships by female baboons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect.

Authors:  Peter G Roma; Alan Silberberg; Angela M Ruggiero; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Affiliation promotes the transmission of a social custom: handclasp grooming among captive chimpanzees.

Authors:  Kristin E Bonnie; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-09-03       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  Hypercortisolism associated with social subordinance or social isolation among wild baboons.

Authors:  R M Sapolsky; S C Alberts; J Altmann
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-12

7.  Influence of personality, age, sex, and estrous state on chimpanzee problem-solving success.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Sara A Price; Hani D Freeman; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Rachel L Kendal
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Lisa Horn; Zsófia Viranyi; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Susan C Alberts; Jeanne Altmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Different responses to reward comparisons by three primate species.

Authors:  Hani D Freeman; Jennifer Sullivan; Lydia M Hopper; Catherine F Talbot; Andrea N Holmes; Nancy Schultz-Darken; Lawrence E Williams; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes) Are More Averse to Social Than Nonsocial Risk.

Authors:  Sarah E Calcutt; Darby Proctor; Sarah M Berman; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-12-04

2.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Inequity aversion strategies between marmosets are influenced by partner familiarity and sex but not oxytocin.

Authors:  Aaryn C Mustoe; April M Harnisch; Benjamin Hochfelder; Jon Cavanaugh; Jeffrey A French
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Relationships between captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) welfare and voluntary participation in behavioural studies.

Authors:  Sarah J Neal Webb; Jann Hau; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.448

6.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) tolerate some degree of inequity while cooperating but refuse to donate effort for nothing.

Authors:  Matthew W Campbell; Julia Watzek; Malini Suchak; Sarah M Berman; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 7.  What behaviour in economic games tells us about the evolution of non-human species' economic decision-making behaviour.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Studying primate cognition in a social setting to improve validity and welfare: a literature review highlighting successful approaches.

Authors:  Katherine A Cronin; Sarah L Jacobson; Kristin E Bonnie; Lydia M Hopper
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game.

Authors:  Ryan Sigmundson; Mathieu S Stribos; Roy Hammer; Julia Herzele; Lena S Pflüger; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Dogs' reaction to inequity is affected by inhibitory control.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Friederike Range; Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.