Literature DB >> 32221790

Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.

Sfakianoudis Konstantinos1, Tsioulou Petroula2, Maziotis Evangelos2, Giannelou Polina2, Glava Argyro2, Grigoriadis Sokratis2, Rapani Anna2, Nezos Andrianos2, Pantou Agni1, Koutsilieris Michael2, Pantos Konstantinos1, Mastorakos George3, Simopoulou Mara4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide data on the practice of Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval (LuPOR). The authors assess cell-free DNA levels in follicular fluid (ff cfDNA) from poor responders undergoing natural cycles, and comparing it to respective data originating from follicular phase oocyte retrievals.
METHODS: Forty-seven women were eligible for this prospective study. Participants were classified as poor responders based on Bologna criteria while being detected with a second follicular wave. Follicular fluid was collected and prepared for cfDNA extraction. Levels of cfDNA were quantified via Q-PCR employing the ALU115 and ALU247 primers. These primers are associated with apoptotic and necrotic events. Levels of ff cfDNA resulting from follicular phase oocyte retrieval (FoPOR) and LuPOR-performed in a single menstrual cycle were associated with the number and maturation status of yielded oocytes and the number and fertilization status of resulting zygotes. Survival rate following thawing of cryopreserved zygotes, along with the resulting number of cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryos are provided.
RESULTS: Mean levels of ALU115 were significantly lower during FoPOR when compared to LuPOR (0.79 ± 0.72 vs 1.46 ± 1.59 ng/μl, p = 0.02). Regarding the FoPOR group, a significant positive correlation of serum estradiol and ALU115 concentration (p = 0.04) was revealed. A significant negative correlation between serum estradiol and cfDNA integrity was observed both during FoPOR (p = 0.03) and LuPOR (p = 0.03). A significant lower number of retrieved (1.09 ± 0.28 vs 1.29 ± 0.58, p = 0.02) and MII oocytes (0.77 ± 0.55 vs 1.08 ± 0.61, p = 0.02) was observed when comparing the FoPOR to LuPOR groups respectively. The integrity of cfDNA was observed to be higher in FoPOR originating embryos that arrested either prior to cleavage (0.28 ± 0.13 vs 0.17 ± 0.10, p = 0.006) or prior to blastocyst formation (0.28 ± 0.12 vs 0.13 ± 0.06, p = 0.04). In the case of LuPOR originating embryos, cfDNA integrity was observed to be higher in embryos that arrested only prior to the blastocyst stage (0.27 ± 0.20 vs 0.11 ± 0.07, p = 0.008). Similarly, cfDNA integrity was observed to be lower in top quality blastocysts originating from FoPOR (0.07 ± 0.04 vs 0.17 ± 0.05, p = 0.03) and in top quality cleavage stage embryos (0.09 ± 0.06 vs 0.31 ± 0.22, p = 0.01) and blastocysts (0.06 ± 0.02 vs 0.14 ± 0.06, p = 0.02) originating from LuPOR.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ff originating from LuPOR presents with higher levels of cfDNA. The higher cfDNA levels are attributed to mainly apoptotic events, as the ALU247 levels and DNA integrity did not differ statistically significantly between FoPOR and LuPOR. The absolute mean level of ALU247 corresponding to necrotic events was higher in LuPOR. Regarding embryological data, cfDNA integrity was correlated with both number and quality of cleavage stage embryos in both FoPOR and LuPOR, along with blastocyst stage embryos in LuPOR. Necrotic events were associated with poorer blastocyst formation rate and blastocyst quality in LuPOR. As the comparison between FoPOR and LuPOR results to similar IVF laboratory data, the practice of LuPOR may stand as a promising approach for poor responders, while it merits further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Cell-free DNA; Follicular fluid; Luteal phase oocyte retrieval; Natural cycles; Poor responders

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32221790      PMCID: PMC7244659          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01743-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  36 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: a review.

Authors:  Angela R Baerwald; Gregg P Adams; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Nikolaos P Polyzos; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Dual ovarian stimulation and random start in assisted reproductive technologies: from ovarian biology to clinical application.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Roberta Venturella; Damiano Vizziello; Francesco Bulletti; Filippo M Ubaldi
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Double ovarian stimulation during the follicular and luteal phase in women ≥38 years: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Conghui Liu; Hong Jiang; Wenxiang Zhang; Huiqun Yin
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol).

Authors:  Yanping Kuang; Qiuju Chen; Qingqing Hong; Qifeng Lyu; Ai Ai; Yonglun Fu; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation increases the number of mature oocytes in older women with severe diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Justin Rashtian; John Zhang
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 7.  Comparative patterns of follicle development and selection in ruminants.

Authors:  G P Adams
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  1999

8.  A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Angela R Baerwald; Gregg P Adams; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is feasible for producing competent oocytes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, with optimal pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Yanping Kuang; Qingqing Hong; Qiuju Chen; Qifeng Lyu; Ai Ai; Yonglun Fu; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Poor ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Padma Rekha Jirge
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cell-free DNA discoveries in human reproductive medicine: providing a new tool for biomarker and genetic assays in ART.

Authors:  Maryam Qasemi; Reza Mahdian; Fardin Amidi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Development of a predictive model for luteal phase oocyte retrieval in poor responders undergoing natural cycle IVF.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Dionysios Galatis; Evangelos Maziotis; Agni Pantou; Polina Giannelou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Panagiotis Tzonis; Theodora Griva; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Anastasios Philippou; Michael Koutsilieris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Polina Giannelou; Mara Simopoulou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Evangelos Makrakis; Adamantia Kontogeorgi; Agni Pantou; Dionysios Galatis; Theodoros Kalampokas; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.