Literature DB >> 22035534

Measuring decisional control preferences in men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Nora B Henrikson1, B Joyce Davison, Donna L Berry.   

Abstract

The Control Preferences Scale is widely used in decision research to measure patient preferences for participation in treatment decision making with health care providers. Following anecdotal reports of confusion with the scale the authors conducted an exploratory interview study to examine perceptions of the meaning and applicability of the Control Preferences Scale for men with localized prostate cancer seeking treatment in a multidisciplinary urology clinic. The preliminary data suggest potential validity challenges when the Control Preferences Scale is used in a multidisciplinary prostate cancer care setting, including the clinical context of localized prostate cancer and the meaning of shared decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 22035534      PMCID： PMC3285491          DOI： 10.1080/07347332.2011.615383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol        ISSN： 0734-7332


  36 in total

Review 1.  Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.

Authors:  Debbie Collins
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Monique W M Jaspers
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Elementary school-aged children's reports of their health: a cognitive interviewing study.

Authors:  G Rebok; A Riley; C Forrest; B Starfield; B Green; J Robertson; E Tambor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; Martin E Gleave; S Larry Goldenberg; Lesley F Degner; Doug Hoffart; Jonathan Berkowitz
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Treatment decision-making by men with localized prostate cancer: the influence of personal factors.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; William J Ellis; Nancy Fugate Woods; Christina Schwien; Kristin H Mullen; Claire Yang
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support.

Authors:  Jennifer Kryworuchko; Dawn Stacey; Carol Bennett; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-12

7.  Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; S Larry Goldenberg; Martin E Gleave; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Women's preferences for and views on decision-making for diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Jacqueline Lim; Phyllis N Butow; Alexandra L Barratt; Sally Redman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Rajiv Samant; Carol Bennett
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.

Authors:  A H Pieterse; M C M Baas-Thijssen; C A M Marijnen; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 7.640
View more
  10 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Patient Decision-Making Factors in Aggressive Treatment of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ramsankar Basak; Deborah S Usinger; Ronald C Chen; Xinglei Shen
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps.

Authors:  Amy Lewis; Despoina Douka; Angeliki Koukoura; Vasiliki Valla; Amie Smirthwaite; Susanne Holm Faarbaek; Efstathios Vassiliadis
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Patient and proxy reports regarding the experience of treatment decision-making in cancer care.

Authors:  Jessica K Roydhouse; Roee Gutman; Ira B Wilson; Kenneth L Kehl; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Antibiotic and shared decision-making preferences among adolescents in Malaysia.

Authors:  Irma Wati Ngadimon; Farida Islahudin; Ernieda Hatah; Noraida Mohamed Shah; Mohd Makmor-Bakry
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  T B Katrien Santema; E Anniek Stoffer; Marleen Kunneman; Mark J W Koelemay; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Assessing the predictive power of psychological empowerment and health literacy for older patients' participation in health care: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Gabriele Sak; Fabia Rothenfluh; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  The Treatment Decision-making Preferences of Patients with Prostate Cancer Should Be Recorded in Research and Clinical Routine: a Pooled Analysis of Four Survey Studies with 7169 Patients.

Authors:  Andreas Ihrig; I Maatouk; H C Friederich; M Baunacke; C Groeben; R Koch; C Thomas; J Huber
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 9.  How best to use and evaluate Patient Information Leaflets given during a consultation: a systematic review of literature reviews.

Authors:  Mélanie Sustersic; Aurélie Gauchet; Alison Foote; Jean-Luc Bosson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Health-related quality Of Life In patients with advanced Soft TIssue sarcomas treated with Chemotherapy (The HOLISTIC study): protocol for an international observational cohort study.

Authors:  Eugenie Younger; Robin L Jones; Ingrid M E Desar; Clare Peckitt; Winette T A van der Graaf; Olga Husson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.