Literature DB >> 12515988

Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer.

B Joyce Davison1, S Larry Goldenberg, Martin E Gleave, Lesley F Degner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To determine if providing individualized information to men who are newly diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners would lower their levels of psychological distress and enable them to become more active participants in treatment decision making.
DESIGN: Quasiexperimental, one group, pretest/post-test.
SETTING: The Prostate Centre at Vancouver General Hospital in British Columbia, Canada. SAMPLE: Convenience sample of 74 couples. 73 men had early-stage prostate cancer. Mean age of the men was 62.2 years, and mean age of the partners was 58.1 years. The majority (> 50%) had received their high school diplomas.
METHODS: Respondents completed measures of decision preferences and psychological distress at the time of diagnosis and four months later. All participants used a computer to identify their information and decision preferences. Computer-generated, graphic printouts were used to guide the information counseling session.
FINDINGS: Patients reported assuming a more active role in medical decision making than originally intended, partners assumed a more passive role in decision making than originally intended, and all participants had lower levels of psychological distress at four months.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supports the need to provide informational support to couples at the prostate cancer diagnosis to facilitate treatment decision making and lower levels of psychological distress. Future research is needed to evaluate this type of approach in the context of a randomized clinical trial design. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The personalized, computer-graphic printouts can provide clinicians with an innovative method of guiding information counseling and providing decisional support to men with prostate cancer and their partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12515988     DOI: 10.1188/03.ONF.107-114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  41 in total

1.  Patient Decision Making Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: What Is and Is Not Involved.

Authors:  Çağatay Doğan; Hamza M Gültekin; Sarper M Erdoğan; Hamdi Özkara; Zübeyr Talat; Ahmet N Erözenci; Can Öbek
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-09-21

2.  Information Needs of Men with Localized Prostate Cancer During Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Seth E Wolpin; Jason Parks; Mary Galligan; Kenneth J Russell; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Emma Turner; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Hispanics Participating in a Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program.

Authors:  Jennifer C Molokwu; Eribeth Penaranda; Navkiran Shokar
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-10

5.  Effect of intervention on decision making of treatment for disease progression, prostate-specific antigen biochemical failure and prostate cancer death.

Authors:  Rex C-C Huang; Anssi Auvinen; Matti Hakama; Teuvo L J Tammela; Martti Ala-Opas; Mikael Leppilahti; Timo Vornanen; Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  [Elderly prostate cancer patients: patient information and shared decision making].

Authors:  N Ernstmann; J Jaeger; C Kowalski; H Pfaff; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp; Seema Singhal; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Tariman; D L Berry; B Cochrane; A Doorenbos; K Schepp
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Is "Active Surveillance" an Acceptable Alternative?: A Qualitative Study of Couples' Decision Making about Early-Stage, Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yen-Chi L Le; Stephanie L McFall; Theresa L Byrd; Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor; Deborah A Kuban; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth       Date:  2016

Review 10.  Counseling patients about sexual health when considering post-prostatectomy radiation treatment.

Authors:  D Wittmann; J E Montie; D A Hamstra; H Sandler; D P Wood
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.