Literature DB >> 18755939

Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation.

Dawn Stacey1, Rajiv Samant, Carol Bennett.   

Abstract

Although cancer management is becoming more structured with disease-specific guidelines and clinical pathways, many decisions remain complex. Contributing to this complexity is the need to make value tradeoffs between benefits and harms across cancer treatment and/or screening options. Since there is no "best" option for everyone, decisions are defined as being of higher quality when informed with the latest scientific evidence and based on patients' informed values associated with outcomes of options. However, clinicians are not good judges of patients' values, and patients often have inadequate knowledge, unrealistic expectations, and decisional conflict that interfere with their involvement in decision making. Effective approaches to support patient involvement into clinical decisions include clinicians trained in shared decision making, question prompt sheets, patient decision aids, and decision coaching by nurses and other allied health professionals. Based on systematic review of 23 randomized trials of cancer patient decision aids, patients exposed to decision aids are more likely to participate in decision making and achieve higher-quality decisions. This review highlights key historical changes leading to patient involvement in decision making, summarizes evidence on effective interventions to support shared decision making, explores strategies to implement these interventions in oncology practices, and identifies future directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18755939     DOI: 10.3322/CA.2008.0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  75 in total

1.  Oncology residents' perspectives on communication skills and shared decision making.

Authors:  Rajiv Samant; Inge Aivas; Jean-Marc Bourque; Tara Tucker
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Symptoms from treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib: a multicenter explorative cohort study to explore the influence of patient-reported outcomes on therapy decisions.

Authors:  J J Koldenhof; P O Witteveen; R de Vos; M Walraven; C N Tillier; H M W Verheul; S C C M Teunissen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Understanding patient perspectives on communication about the cost of cancer care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Erin W Hofstatter
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Development of an online, patient-centred decision aid for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in the transoral robotic surgery era.

Authors:  J S Lam; G M Scott; D A Palma; K Fung; A V Louie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Information needs and Internet use in urological and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Beatriz Valero-Aguilera; Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo; José Francisco García-Gutiérrez; Jaime Jiménez-Pernett; José Manuel Cózar-Olmo; Rosario Guerrero-Tejada; Rubén Alba-Ruiz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Effect of advanced cancer patients' awareness of disease status on treatment decisional conflicts and satisfaction during palliative chemotherapy: a Korean prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Baek; Si-young Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Young Ho Yun; Myung Kyung Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Multicriteria decision analysis in oncology.

Authors:  Georges Adunlin; Vakaramoko Diaby; Alberto J Montero; Hong Xiao
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice.

Authors:  Rachel Zeuner; Dominick L Frosch; Marie D Kuzemchak; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  On the development of a decision support intervention for mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 cancer genetic testing regarding communicating test results to their children.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.

Authors:  Bryan Leyva; Alexander Persoskie; Allison Ottenbacher; Jada G Hamilton; Jennifer D Allen; Sarah C Kobrin; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.