Literature DB >> 11838719

Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners.

B Joyce Davison1, Martin E Gleave, S Larry Goldenberg, Lesley F Degner, Doug Hoffart, Jonathan Berkowitz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and compare information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners at the time of diagnosis. A convenience sample of 80 couples was recruited from The Prostate Centre in Vancouver, Canada. Participants used a computerized version of two previously used measures with this population: Control Preferences Scale and Information Survey Questionnaire. Results showed that men had a preference to play either an active or a collaborative role in decision making with their physician (92.5%) and partners (100%). The majority (55%) of partners wanted to play a collaborative role in treatment decision making. Couples identified prognosis, stage of disease, treatment options, and side effects as the top 4 information preferences. Men ranked information on sexuality more important than partners, and partners ranked information on home self-care higher than men. Men who had sons, a positive family history, and lower levels of education ranked heredity risk significantly higher. Profiles of information categories did not differ according to role preferences of either men or partners. The computer program has been shown to be a reliable and acceptable method of assessing information and decision preferences of these couples. An individualized approach is suggested, given the high reliability of individual's profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11838719     DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200202000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  51 in total

1.  Information Needs of Men with Localized Prostate Cancer During Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Seth E Wolpin; Jason Parks; Mary Galligan; Kenneth J Russell; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Proxy evaluation of health-related quality of life: a conceptual framework for understanding multiple proxy perspectives.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Sara J Knight
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Information needs of cancer patients: a comparison of nurses' and patients' perceptions.

Authors:  Gülsüm Ançel
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Involvement in Decision Making and Satisfaction With Treatment Among Partners of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Localized Prostate Cancer

Authors:  Yael Symes; Lixin Song; Rachael G Heineman; Brittney D Barbosa; Kimberly Tatum; Giselle Greene; Mark Weaver; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 5.  Brain cancer patient and support persons' experiences of psychosocial care: a mapping of research outputs.

Authors:  Lucy A P Boyd; Amy E Waller; David Hill; Rob W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Measuring decisional control preferences in men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; B Joyce Davison; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Tariman; D L Berry; B Cochrane; A Doorenbos; K Schepp
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  A multicenter survey of Hispanic caregiver preferences for patient decision control in the United States and Latin America.

Authors:  Sriram Yennurajalingam; Antonio Noguera; Henrique Afonseca Parsons; Isabel Torres-Vigil; Eva Rosina Duarte; Alejandra Palma; Sofia Bunge; J Lynn Palmer; Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 9.  The top 13: what family physicians should know about prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne Katz; Alan Katz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Counseling patients about sexual health when considering post-prostatectomy radiation treatment.

Authors:  D Wittmann; J E Montie; D A Hamstra; H Sandler; D P Wood
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.