Literature DB >> 27934961

Minimum Electric Field Exposure for Seizure Induction with Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.

Won H Lee1, Sarah H Lisanby2,3, Andrew F Laine4, Angel V Peterchev2,5,6.   

Abstract

Lowering and individualizing the current amplitude in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been proposed as a means to produce stimulation closer to the neural activation threshold and more focal seizure induction, which could potentially reduce cognitive side effects. However, the effect of current amplitude on the electric field (E-field) in the brain has not been previously linked to the current amplitude threshold for seizure induction. We coupled MRI-based E-field models with amplitude titrations of motor threshold (MT) and seizure threshold (ST) in four nonhuman primates (NHPs) to determine the strength, distribution, and focality of stimulation in the brain for four ECT electrode configurations (bilateral, bifrontal, right-unilateral, and frontomedial) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST) with cap coil on vertex. At the amplitude-titrated ST, the stimulated brain subvolume (23-63%) was significantly less than for conventional ECT with high, fixed current (94-99%). The focality of amplitude-titrated right-unilateral ECT (25%) was comparable to cap coil MST (23%), demonstrating that ECT with a low current amplitude and focal electrode placement can induce seizures with E-field as focal as MST, although these electrode and coil configurations affect differently specific brain regions. Individualizing the current amplitude reduced interindividual variation in the stimulation focality by 40-53% for ECT and 26% for MST, supporting amplitude individualization as a means of dosing especially for ECT. There was an overall significant correlation between the measured amplitude-titrated ST and the prediction of the E-field models, supporting a potential role of these models in dosing of ECT and MST. These findings may guide the development of seizure therapy dosing paradigms with improved risk/benefit ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27934961      PMCID: PMC5437889          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  28 in total

1.  High-quality consistent meshing of multi-label datasets.

Authors:  J P Pons; E Ségonne; J D Boissonnat; L Rineau; M Yvinec; R Keriven
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2007

2.  Brief stimulus therapy; psysiological and clinical observations.

Authors:  W T LIBERSON
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Electric field characteristics of electroconvulsive therapy with individualized current amplitude: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

4.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities.

Authors:  H A Sackeim; J Prudic; D P Devanand; M S Nobler; S H Lisanby; S Peyser; L Fitzsimons; B J Moody; J Clark
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05

5.  Relief of expressed suicidal intent by ECT: a consortium for research in ECT study.

Authors:  Charles H Kellner; Max Fink; Rebecca Knapp; Georgios Petrides; Mustafa Husain; Teresa Rummans; Martina Mueller; Hilary Bernstein; Keith Rasmussen; Kevin O'connor; Glenn Smith; A John Rush; Melanie Biggs; Shawn McClintock; Samuel Bailine; Chitra Malur
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Bitemporal Versus High-Dose Unilateral Twice-Weekly Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression (EFFECT-Dep): A Pragmatic, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Authors:  Maria Semkovska; Sabine Landau; Ross Dunne; Erik Kolshus; Adam Kavanagh; Ana Jelovac; Martha Noone; Mary Carton; Sinead Lambe; Caroline McHugh; Declan M McLoughlin
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.635

Review 9.  Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eric Cretaz; André R Brunoni; Beny Lafer
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 10.  How good is the macaque monkey model of the human brain?

Authors:  Richard Passingham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Using rAAV2-retro in rhesus macaques: Promise and caveats for circuit manipulation.

Authors:  Adriana K Cushnie; Hala G El-Nahal; Martin O Bohlen; Paul J May; Michele A Basso; Piercesare Grimaldi; Maya Zhe Wang; Marron Fernandez de Velasco Ezequiel; Marc A Sommer; Sarah R Heilbronner
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Novel Stimulation Approaches with ECT: Why Everything Old May be New Again.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis; Yinming Sun
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Adeno-Associated Virus Capsid-Promoter Interactions in the Brain Translate from Rat to the Nonhuman Primate.

Authors:  Martin O Bohlen; Thomas J McCown; Sara K Powell; Hala G El-Nahal; Tierney Daw; Michele A Basso; Marc A Sommer; R Jude Samulski
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.695

4.  A Computational Assessment of Target Engagement in the Treatment of Auditory Hallucinations with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Nigel I Kennedy; Marom Bikson; Sophia Frangou
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Shorter recovery times and better cognitive function-A comparative pilot study of magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy in patients with depressive episodes.

Authors:  Junyan Zhang; Yanping Ren; Wei Jiang; Jiong Luo; Fang Yan; Yilang Tang; Xin Ma
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Electroconvulsive therapy, electric field, neuroplasticity, and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Miklos Argyelan; Jeremy Miller; Davin K Quinn; Megan Lloyd; Thomas R Jones; Joel Upston; Erik Erhardt; Shawn M McClintock; Christopher C Abbott
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.437

7.  Rapid, Dose-Dependent Enhancement of Cerebral Blood Flow by transcranial AC Stimulation in Mouse.

Authors:  Dennis A Turner; Simone Degan; Francesca Galeffi; Stephen Schmidt; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 9.  Innate Immune Regulation Under Magnetic Fields With Possible Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Hong Lei; Yi Pan; Rongqian Wu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.