| Literature DB >> 22022529 |
Eini Niskanen1, Mervi Könönen, Sara Määttä, Merja Hallikainen, Miia Kivipelto, Silvia Casarotto, Marcello Massimini, Ritva Vanninen, Esa Mervaala, Jari Karhu, Hilkka Soininen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Combination of structural and functional data of the human brain can provide detailed information of neurodegenerative diseases and the influence of the disease on various local cortical areas. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22022529 PMCID: PMC3192142 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Detailed subject demographics as well as electric field values (EFMT) corresponding to the resting motor threshold of thenar musculature, and ROI cortical thicknesses for each group.
| Group | N (males/females) | Age (years) | MMSE | Handedness (right/left/ambidextrous) | EFMT (V/m) | Cortical thickness (mm) | ||
| M1/S1 | Precuneus | Cuneus | ||||||
| AD | 15 (5/10) | 73.7±7.5 | 18.9±4.1 | 14/1/- | 89.7±17.4 | 2.3±0.3 | 3.1±0.4 | 2.7±0.2 |
| MCI | 18 (9/9) | 71.6±8.0 | 23.7±2.7 | 18/-/- | 91.1±21.3 | 2.4±0.4 | 3.3±0.3 | 2.8±0.3 |
| Controls | 21 (10/11) | 71.9±5.9 | 28.4±1.4 | 19/1/1 | 87.8±11.9 | 2.5±0.4 | 3.3±0.2 | 2.8±0.2 |
For each parameter, except N and handedness, the group mean and standard deviation are presented.
Significant difference among groups, (Kruskal-Wallis), p<0.001 and between groups in all pair-wise comparisons (Mann-Whitney), p<0.001
Significant difference among groups, (Kruskal-Wallis), p<0.05
Significantly different from AD, (Mann-Whitney), p<0.05
Figure 1TMS measurements in a representative subject.
A) The area around the anatomically defined hand-knob was extensively mapped to find the optimal stimulation area of the thenar muscle. The orange dots illustrate the stimulation locations for mapping and the yellow brick shows the coil orientation for the optimal stimulation site. B) The software estimates the induced electrical field on the surface and visualizes it with colors. C) The electrical field value corresponding to the resting motor threshold is shown numerically on top of the sagittal, coronal and axial slices. The crosshair shows the optimal stimulation location for the thenar muscle on the surface between grey and white matter.
Figure 2The areas of significant negative correlation between cortical thickness and EFMT for all subjects (p<0.05, FDR-corrected) (upper row) and the corresponding regions of interest with a cluster minimum of 100 nodes (lower row).
ROI 1 includes areas on M1 and S1 (in blue), ROI 2 encompasses the precuneus (in yellow) and ROI 3 in the cuneus (in red).
Figure 3Scatter plots of the relationships between EFMT and mean cortical thickness for AD patients (left column), MCI patients (middle column) and controls (right column) for M1/S1 on the first row, for the precuneus on the second row, and for the cuneus on the third row.
The corresponding significance of the correlation is presented in the top right corner of each plot. Statistically significant (p<0.05) correlations are presented with solid regression lines.