Literature DB >> 18662721

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold.

Nils Danner1, Petro Julkunen, Mervi Könönen, Laura Säisänen, Jouko Nurkkala, Jari Karhu.   

Abstract

The motor threshold (MT) is a fundamental parameter for evaluating cortical excitability in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) despite remarkable variation, both within, and between subjects. We intended to test whether the variation could be reduced by targeting the stimulation on-line and modeling the TMS-induced electric field on individual MR images. Navigated TMS was used to map the primary motor cortex for the representation area of the thenar muscles (abductor pollicis brevis) and to determine the MT. Thirteen healthy subjects participated in the study. To determine the between-subject variation, the MTs of nine subjects were measured with two different stimulators (comparison study). To study the individual variation, the MT measurement was repeated 20 times in four subjects always using the same stimulator (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the MTs differed significantly between the two stimulators over all subjects (p<0.001), whereas the electric field strengths did not exhibit significant difference between the stimulators. Both, the MTs, and the electric field strengths showed similar variations, which were greater between subjects (comparison study) than within subjects (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the distance between the locations of the two different coils on the scalp was significantly greater than the distance between the induced electric field maxima in the brain (p<0.001). We conclude that on-line navigation can be used to reduce the variation caused by different stimulator types and individual subject anatomy. In addition, cortical excitability can be evaluated by using computed electric field strength as well as stimulator-dependent MT.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18662721     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  12 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Group-level variations in motor representation areas of thenar and anterior tibial muscles: Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.

Authors:  Eini Niskanen; Petro Julkunen; Laura Säisänen; Ritva Vanninen; Pasi Karjalainen; Mervi Könönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neuronavigation-guided Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Aphasia.

Authors:  Woo-Jin Kim; Soo Jung Hahn; Won-Seok Kim; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Characterizing off-target corticospinal responses to double-cone transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F Proessl; M C Canino; M E Beckner; A M Sinnott; S R Eagle; A D LaGoy; W R Conkright; A J Sterczala; C Connaboy; F Ferrarelli; A Germain; B C Nindl; S D Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by navigated mapping of optimal TMS current directions in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Jennifer M Perez; Jared C Horvath; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  New insights into Alzheimer's disease progression: a combined TMS and structural MRI study.

Authors:  Eini Niskanen; Mervi Könönen; Sara Määttä; Merja Hallikainen; Miia Kivipelto; Silvia Casarotto; Marcello Massimini; Ritva Vanninen; Esa Mervaala; Jari Karhu; Hilkka Soininen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A New Strategy in Mild Cognitive Impairment?

Authors:  Agustina Birba; Agustín Ibáñez; Lucas Sedeño; Jesica Ferrari; Adolfo M García; Máximo Zimerman
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 8.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Brain Oscillations.

Authors:  Johannes Vosskuhl; Daniel Strüber; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Probing Corticospinal Recruitment Patterns and Functional Synergies with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  James Mathew; Angelika Kübler; Robert Bauer; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  Increased Inhibition in Non-Primary Motor Areas of String-Instrument Players: A Preliminary Study with Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Selja Vaalto; Petro Julkunen; Laura Säïsänen; Mervi Könönen; Sara Määttä; Jari Karhu
Journal:  Brain Plast       Date:  2016-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.