Literature DB >> 15890159

The repeatability of corticomotor threshold measurements.

V K Kimiskidis1, S Papagiannopoulos, K Sotirakoglou, D A Kazis, G Dimopoulos, A Kazis, K R Mills.   

Abstract

Threshold (Th) is a neurophysiological parameter frequently used in TMS studies. The present study was designed to investigate the repeatability of the Th measurements by reexamining healthy subjects over various time points. Overall, 82 subjects (median age: 19 years, range: 12-65) entered the study. Following a baseline examination, there were six retest sessions: S0 (n = 8 hemispheres reexamined, mean interval x = 19 min), S1 (n = 34 hemispheres reexamined, mean interval x = 4 days), S2 (n = 32 hemispheres, x = 29 days), S3 (n = 30 hemispheres, x = 106 days), S4 (n = 30 hemispheres, x = 183 days) and S5 (n = 30 hemispheres, x = 1867 days). Stimulation was performed with a figure of eight coil and Th was defined at 1% steps. At baseline, controls had an MT of 41.1 +/- 8. Mean difference of MT from baseline was 0.62 on S0 (95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference: -1.04 to +2.29), 0.13 on S1 (95% CI: -1.2 to +1.5), -0.03 on S2 (95% CI: -1.1 to +1.06), -2.07 on S3 (95% CI: -4.33 to +0.19), 0.15 on S4 (95% CI: -0.98 to +1.28) and 0.87 on S5 (95% CI: -0.49 to +2.23). None of these differences were statistically significant (repeated measures ANOVA, P > 0.05). The upper limit of MT difference that an individual subject might have with a probability of 95% (measurement error) was 8. The repeatability of the method was found to be independent from the age of the subjects, the magnitude of threshold or the test-retest interval. The topography of corticomotor threshold was also investigated. Minimal threshold values were obtained from a restricted area of scalp sites that always included the fixed stimulation point of the current protocol. Therefore, using a fixed stimulation point is an adequate technique for measuring threshold. In conclusion, threshold is a stable parameter on an individual and group basis. These data quantify the repeatability of the method and may prove useful in the interpretation of findings during longitudinal studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15890159     DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2004.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin        ISSN: 0987-7053            Impact factor:   3.734


  14 in total

1.  Reproducibility of TMS-Evoked EEG responses.

Authors:  Pantelis Lioumis; Dubravko Kicić; Petri Savolainen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The facilitatory effect of duloxetine combined with pelvic floor muscle training on the excitability of urethral sphincter motor neurons.

Authors:  Ulrich Mehnert; Sönke Boy; Sabina Widmer-Simitovic; André Reitz; Brigitte Schurch
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-07

3.  Reproducibility of transcranial magnetic stimulation metrics in the study of proximal upper limb muscles.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Sarah M Roelle; Corin E Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Nicole M Varnerin; David A Cunningham; Jennifer S Sharma; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang H Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Re-emergence of hand-muscle representations in human motor cortex after hand allograft.

Authors:  Claudia D Vargas; Antoine Aballéa; Erika C Rodrigues; Karen T Reilly; Catherine Mercier; Palmina Petruzzo; Jean M Dubernard; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Effects of Waveform and Current Direction on the Efficacy and Test-Retest Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Paula Davila-Pérez; Ali Jannati; Peter J Fried; Javier Cudeiro Mazaira; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Motor cortex representation of the upper-limb in individuals born without a hand.

Authors:  Karen T Reilly; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  New insights into Alzheimer's disease progression: a combined TMS and structural MRI study.

Authors:  Eini Niskanen; Mervi Könönen; Sara Määttä; Merja Hallikainen; Miia Kivipelto; Silvia Casarotto; Marcello Massimini; Ritva Vanninen; Esa Mervaala; Jari Karhu; Hilkka Soininen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reproducibility of Single-Pulse, Paired-Pulse, and Intermittent Theta-Burst TMS Measures in Healthy Aging, Type-2 Diabetes, and Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Paula Davila-Pérez; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Repeatability of long intracortical inhibition in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Annika A de Goede; Michel J A M van Putten
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2016-12-21

10.  Impact of Prefrontal Theta Burst Stimulation on Clinical Neuropsychological Tasks.

Authors:  Raquel Viejo-Sobera; Diego Redolar-Ripoll; Mercè Boixadós; Marc Palaus; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Elena M Marron
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.