Literature DB >> 22019797

Optimizing the subjective depth-of-focus with combinations of fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration.

Yohann Benard1, Norberto Lopez-Gil, Richard Legras.   

Abstract

We optimize the subjective depth of focus (DoF) with combinations of spherical aberration (SA4) and secondary spherical aberration (SA6) in various levels. Subjective DoF was defined as the visual interval for which three 20/50 high-contrast letters was perceived acceptable (objectionable blur limits). We used an adaptive optics system to dynamically correct the observer's aberrations and control their accommodation. DoF was measured with a 0.18-D step on three non-presbyopic subjects. The target seen by the subjects was modified to include 25 combinations of SA4 and SA6 (i.e. 0, ± 0.15 and ± 0.30 μm) for 3, 4.5 and 6mm of pupil diameter. We found a mean DoF of 1.97D with a 3mm pupil size, which decreased by 28% with a 4.5mm pupil and by 34% with a 6mm pupil. For 6mm pupil we found an increase of subjective DoF of 45% and 64% with the addition of 0.3 and 0.6 μm of SA4, and of 52% and 117% with the addition of 0.15 and 0.3 μm of SA6. The largest DoF measured (4.78D) increased 3.6 times that of the naked eye and was found for a combination of opposite signs of SA4 and SA6 of 0.6 and 0.3 μm respectively. Reducing the pupil size minimized the effect of aberrations on subjective DoF. Combination of SA4 and SA6 of opposite sign could increase DoF more than three times for pupils larger than 4.5mm. Subjective DoF is well predicted by measuring the induced variation of vergence arising in the pupil size.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019797     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Perceived image quality with simulated segmented bifocal corrections.

Authors:  Carlos Dorronsoro; Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Pablo de Gracia; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Aberrations and accommodation.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Renfeng Xu; Larry Thibos; Gildas Marin; Martha Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Evaluating Optical Quality of a New Hydrophilic Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens and Comparison to the Monofocal Counterpart: An Optical Bench Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Borkenstein; Eva-Maria Borkenstein; Ruediger Schmid
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-08-30

6.  Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles Crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error: a computational study.

Authors:  Renfeng Xu; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Image Quality Analysis of Eyes Undergoing LASER Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Samrat Sarkar; Pravin Krishna Vaddavalli; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Analysis of higher order aberrations in recently developed wavefront-shaped IOLs.

Authors:  Ruediger Schmid; Andreas F Borkenstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Individual neural transfer function affects the prediction of subjective depth of focus.

Authors:  Alexander Leube; Tim Schilling; Arne Ohlendorf; David Kern; Alex G Ochakovski; M Dominik Fischer; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.