Literature DB >> 34370067

Analysis of higher order aberrations in recently developed wavefront-shaped IOLs.

Ruediger Schmid1, Andreas F Borkenstein2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A new class of enhanced range of vision intraocular lenses (IOLs) has been introduced recently to cope with compromises of diffractive optics in patients aiming for spectacle independence. Few information is available about their optical function. We aimed to analyze higher order aberrations of four of these new wavefront-shaped IOLs under standardized conditions.
METHODS: Two recently developed enhanced monofocal and two recently developed enhanced depth of focus IOLs (power 22 D) were analyzed by a Shack-Hartmann sensor in an in-situ model eye according to ISO 11,979 in NaCl with 546 nm. We determined the Zernike polynomials up to the 10th order.
RESULTS: Only spherical aberration (SA) of different orders was considerably modified. Whereas RaySof EMV showed a moderate increase in Z 4-0, Eyhance and Vivity produced a considerable increase of negative Z 4-0. A combination of Z 4-0 and Z 6-0 with an opposite sign was found in LuxSmart.
CONCLUSION: SAs of different orders are the only relevant Zernike polynomials in this new class of wavefront-shaped IOLs. RaySof EMV proved to be a monofocal IOL with increased positive SA. The central change in radial power and the resulting increase in negative SA in Eyhance IOL might produce some depth of field. The magnitude of SA modification of Vivity and LuxSmart is expected to extend the depth of focus considerably. Surgeons can select among these novel IOLs depending on corneal asphericity and the patient's wish for spectacle independence.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspheric; EDoF; Higher order aberration; Intraocular lens; Presbyopia; Wavefront

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34370067     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05362-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  15 in total

1.  Optimizing the subjective depth-of-focus with combinations of fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration.

Authors:  Yohann Benard; Norberto Lopez-Gil; Richard Legras
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher-order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; Laurent Vabre; Nicolas Chateau; Ronald R Krueger
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Depth of focus and visual acuity with primary and secondary spherical aberration.

Authors:  Fan Yi; D Robert Iskander; Michael Collins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Ocular wavefront analysis of aspheric compared with spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Systematic review with metaanalysis.

Authors:  Alexander K Schuster; Jonas Tesarz; Urs Vossmerbaeumer
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 5.  Special Report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force Consensus Statement for Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Scott MacRae; Jack T Holladay; Adrian Glasser; Don Calogero; Gene Hilmantel; Samuel Masket; Walter Stark; Michelle E Tarver; Tieuvi Nguyen; Malvina Eydelman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Multifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Comparison of Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Trials.

Authors:  Julie M Schallhorn
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Michela Cennamo; Daniel Venturi; Roberto Vignapiano; Eleonora Favuzza
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 8.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

9.  Comparison of new monofocal innovative and standard monofocal intraocular lens after phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Ugur Unsal; Huri Sabur
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Enhancing the Intermediate Vision of Monofocal Intraocular Lenses Using a Higher Order Aspheric Optic.

Authors:  Aixa Alarcon; Carmen Cánovas; Bram Koopman; Henk Weeber; Gerd U Auffarth; Patricia A Piers
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluating Optical Quality of a New Hydrophilic Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens and Comparison to the Monofocal Counterpart: An Optical Bench Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Borkenstein; Eva-Maria Borkenstein; Ruediger Schmid
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-08-30

2.  Analysis of a novel hydrophobic acrylic enhanced monofocal intraocular lens compared to its standard monofocal type on the optical bench.

Authors:  A F Borkenstein; E M Borkenstein; R Schmid
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.