Literature DB >> 36040648

Evaluating Optical Quality of a New Hydrophilic Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens and Comparison to the Monofocal Counterpart: An Optical Bench Analysis.

Andreas F Borkenstein1, Eva-Maria Borkenstein2, Ruediger Schmid3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to analyze the optical properties of a new hydrophilic enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) using optical bench analysis and compare it with its monofocal counterpart.
METHODS: This laboratory study investigates the enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (L-333) and the monofocal counterpart (L-313) IOL by Teleon Surgical, Spankeren, Netherlands on the optical bench, using OptiSpheric IOL PRO2 (Trioptics, Germany) in order to assess the optical quality according to ISO 11979 with ISO-2 Cornea. IOLs (power 22.0 D) were evaluated regarding through frequency modulation transfer function (MTF), Strehl ratio (SR), and through focus MTF at 50 lp/mm using a 3.0-mm and a 4.5-mm aperture. Tilt and decentration were applied. In addition, wavefront measurements were obtained using WaveMaster® IOL 2 device (Trioptics, Germany) and analyzed.
RESULTS: Centered: The MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (L-333/L-313) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.606/0.724 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.330/0.409. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.586/0.809 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.330/0.348. Decentered by 1 mm: The MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (L-333/L-313) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.485/0.705 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.255/0.374. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.457/0.739 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.185/0.268. Tilted by 5 degrees: The MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (L-333/L-313) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.577/0.657 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.345/0.336. The SR (mean) with 3.0 mm aperture was 0.583/0.702 and with 4.5 mm aperture 0.269/0.237. In through focus MTF and aperture of 3.0 mm, the L-333 showed a peak of 0.41 with some enlarged depth of power of about 2 D. For the aperture of 4.5 mm, the MTF values of L-313 and L-333 were slightly reduced; L-333 showed an MTF peak of 0.23 and some reduced depth of power of about 1.5 D. Wavefront measurements showed no major aberrations for the L-313, while a combination of moderate increase in Z 4-0 and Z 6-0 with opposite sign was revealed for the L-333.
CONCLUSION: The enhanced monofocal Lentis Quantum (L-333) produces some enlarged depth of focus by combining spherical aberration of different order and opposite sign. The Lentis Quantum performs very well in comparison to the aspherical monofocal counterpart owing to its optical design. Results with large apertures were sufficient too, suggesting that  the lens is a good option in eyes with a wide pupil and thus in refractive surgeries of young patients.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDoF; Enhanced monofocal intraocular lens; Laboratory study; Modulation transfer function MTF; New IOL; Optical bench analysis; Spectacle independence; Wavefront measurement

Year:  2022        PMID: 36040648     DOI: 10.1007/s40123-022-00561-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther


  15 in total

Review 1.  Special Report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force Consensus Statement for Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Scott MacRae; Jack T Holladay; Adrian Glasser; Don Calogero; Gene Hilmantel; Samuel Masket; Walter Stark; Michelle E Tarver; Tieuvi Nguyen; Malvina Eydelman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sumitra S Khandelwal; Jason J Jun; Selene Mak; Marika Suttorp Booth; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Defocus curves of 4 presbyopia-correcting IOL designs: Diffractive panfocal, diffractive trifocal, segmental refractive, and extended-depth-of-focus.

Authors:  Myriam Böhm; Kerstin Petermann; Eva Hemkeppler; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Visual Strehl performance of IOL designs with extended depth of focus.

Authors:  Augusto Arias Gallego; Salvador Bará; Zbigniew Jaroszewicz; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Luba Rodov; Olga Reitblat; Adi Levy; Ehud I Assia; Guy Kleinmann
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview.

Authors:  Jorge L Alio; Ana B Plaza-Puche; Roberto Férnandez-Buenaga; Joseph Pikkel; Miguel Maldonado
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Visual Outcomes and Subjective Experience After Combined Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus and Trifocal IOLs.

Authors:  Richard N McNeely; Salissou Moutari; Christoph Palme; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Visual Performance of a New Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Compared to a Distance-Dominant Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Nicole Balducci; Piero Barboni
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Yi Dong; Yan Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.