OBJECTIVES: To develop and apply formal ontology creation methods to the domain of antimicrobial prescribing and to formally evaluate the resulting ontology through intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation studies. METHODS: We extended existing ontology development methods to create the ontology and implemented the ontology using Protégé-OWL. Correctness of the ontology was assessed using a set of ontology design principles and domain expert review via the laddering technique. We created three artifacts to support the extrinsic evaluation (set of prescribing rules, alerts and an ontology-driven alert module, and a patient database) and evaluated the usefulness of the ontology for performing knowledge management tasks to maintain the ontology and for generating alerts to guide antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS: The ontology includes 199 classes, 10 properties, and 1636 description logic restrictions. Twenty-three Semantic Web Rule Language rules were written to generate three prescribing alerts: (1) antibiotic-microorganism mismatch alert; (2) medication-allergy alert; and (3) non-recommended empiric antibiotic therapy alert. The evaluation studies confirmed the correctness of the ontology, usefulness of the ontology for representing and maintaining antimicrobial treatment knowledge rules, and usefulness of the ontology for generating alerts to provide feedback to clinicians during antibiotic prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the understanding of ontology development and evaluation methods and addresses one knowledge gap related to using ontologies as a clinical decision support system component-a need for formal ontology evaluation methods to measure their quality from the perspective of their intrinsic characteristics and their usefulness for specific tasks.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and apply formal ontology creation methods to the domain of antimicrobial prescribing and to formally evaluate the resulting ontology through intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation studies. METHODS: We extended existing ontology development methods to create the ontology and implemented the ontology using Protégé-OWL. Correctness of the ontology was assessed using a set of ontology design principles and domain expert review via the laddering technique. We created three artifacts to support the extrinsic evaluation (set of prescribing rules, alerts and an ontology-driven alert module, and a patient database) and evaluated the usefulness of the ontology for performing knowledge management tasks to maintain the ontology and for generating alerts to guide antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS: The ontology includes 199 classes, 10 properties, and 1636 description logic restrictions. Twenty-three Semantic Web Rule Language rules were written to generate three prescribing alerts: (1) antibiotic-microorganism mismatch alert; (2) medication-allergy alert; and (3) non-recommended empiric antibiotic therapy alert. The evaluation studies confirmed the correctness of the ontology, usefulness of the ontology for representing and maintaining antimicrobial treatment knowledge rules, and usefulness of the ontology for generating alerts to provide feedback to clinicians during antibiotic prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the understanding of ontology development and evaluation methods and addresses one knowledge gap related to using ontologies as a clinical decision support system component-a need for formal ontology evaluation methods to measure their quality from the perspective of their intrinsic characteristics and their usefulness for specific tasks.
Authors: Daniel L Rubin; Suzanna E Lewis; Chris J Mungall; Sima Misra; Monte Westerfield; Michael Ashburner; Ida Sim; Christopher G Chute; Harold Solbrig; Margaret-Anne Storey; Barry Smith; John Day-Richter; Natalya F Noy; Mark A Musen Journal: OMICS Date: 2006
Authors: Ron Dagan; Galia Barkai; Noga Givon-Lavi; Amir Z Sharf; Daniel Vardy; Ted Cohen; Marc Lipsitch; David Greenberg Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Natalya F Noy; Nigam H Shah; Patricia L Whetzel; Benjamin Dai; Michael Dorf; Nicholas Griffith; Clement Jonquet; Daniel L Rubin; Margaret-Anne Storey; Christopher G Chute; Mark A Musen Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Kirsty L Buising; Karin A Thursky; James F Black; Lachlan MacGregor; Alan C Street; Marcus P Kennedy; Graham V Brown Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Christopher Ochs; Ankur Agrawal; Yehoshua Perl; Michael Halper; Samson W Tu; Simona Carini; Ida Sim; Natasha Noy; Mark Musen; James Geller Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2012-11-03
Authors: Claire L Gordon; Stephanie Pouch; Lindsay G Cowell; Mary Regina Boland; Heather L Platt; Albert Goldfain; Chunhua Weng Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2013-11-16