Literature DB >> 24454586

Transforming user needs into functional requirements for an antibiotic clinical decision support system: explicating content analysis for system design.

T J Bright1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many informatics studies use content analysis to generate functional requirements for system development. Explication of this translational process from qualitative data to functional requirements can strengthen the understanding and scientific rigor when applying content analysis in informatics studies.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a user-centered approach transforming emergent themes derived from focus group data into functional requirements for informatics solutions and to illustrate these methods to the development of an antibiotic clinical decision support system (CDS).
METHODS: THE APPROACH CONSISTED OF FIVE STEPS: 1) identify unmet therapeutic planning information needs via Focus Group Study-I, 2) develop a coding framework of therapeutic planning themes to refine the domain scope to antibiotic therapeutic planning, 3) identify functional requirements of an antibiotic CDS system via Focus Group Study-II, 4) discover informatics solutions and functional requirements from coded data, and 5) determine the types of information needed to support the antibiotic CDS system and link with the identified informatics solutions and functional requirements.
RESULTS: The coding framework for Focus Group Study-I revealed unmet therapeutic planning needs. Twelve subthemes emerged and were clustered into four themes; analysis indicated a need for an antibiotic CDS intervention. Focus Group Study-II included five types of information needs. Comments from the Barrier/Challenge to information access and Function/Feature themes produced three informatics solutions and 13 functional requirements of an antibiotic CDS system. Comments from the Patient, Institution, and Domain themes generated required data elements for each informatics solution.
CONCLUSION: This study presents one example explicating content analysis of focus group data and the analysis process to functional requirements from narrative data. Illustration of this 5-step method was used to develop an antibiotic CDS system, resolving unmet antibiotic prescribing needs. As a reusable approach, these techniques can be refined and applied to resolve unmet information needs with informatics interventions in additional domains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data collection methods; clinical decision support systems; focus groups; needs assessment; user-computer interface

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24454586      PMCID: PMC3885919          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  27 in total

1.  Impact of a clinical decision support system on antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: quasi-experimental trial.

Authors:  Arch G Mainous; Carol A Lambourne; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  User-centered requirements engineering in health information systems: a study in the hemophilia field.

Authors:  Leonor Teixeira; Carlos Ferreira; Beatriz Sousa Santos
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The challenge of electronic health records (EHRs) design and implementation: responses of health workers to drawing a 'big and rich picture' of a future EHR programme using animated tools.

Authors:  K Neil Jenkings; Robert G Wilson
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2007

4.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Development and evaluation of an ontology for guiding appropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Authors:  Tiffani J Bright; E Yoko Furuya; Gilad J Kuperman; James J Cimino; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Use of a computer decision support system and antimicrobial therapy appropriateness.

Authors:  Gregory A Filice; Dimitri M Drekonja; Joseph R Thurn; Thomas S Rector; Galen M Hamann; Bobbie T Masoud; Anne-Marie Leuck; Curtis L Nordgaard; Meredith K Eilertson; James R Johnson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 7.  Interface design principles for usable decision support: a targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions.

Authors:  Jan Horsky; Gordon D Schiff; Douglas Johnston; Lauren Mercincavage; Douglas Bell; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Perceptions of factors influencing use of an electronic record for case management of persons living with HIV.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Peter Gordon; Eli Camhi; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2011-03

Review 9.  Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tiffani J Bright; Anthony Wong; Ravi Dhurjati; Erin Bristow; Lori Bastian; Remy R Coeytaux; Gregory Samsa; Vic Hasselblad; John W Williams; Michael D Musty; Liz Wing; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders; David Lobach
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Use of an electronic health record clinical decision support tool to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections: the ABX-TRIP study.

Authors:  Cara B Litvin; Steven M Ornstein; Andrea M Wessell; Lynne S Nemeth; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of User-Interface Alert Displays for Clinical Decision Support Systems for Sepsis.

Authors:  Devida Long; Muge Capan; Susan Mascioli; Danielle Weldon; Ryan Arnold; Kristen Miller
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.708

Review 2.  Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support.

Authors:  Kristen Miller; Danielle Mosby; Muge Capan; Rebecca Kowalski; Raj Ratwani; Yaman Noaiseh; Rachel Kraft; Sanford Schwartz; William S Weintraub; Ryan Arnold
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  The design of decisions: Matching clinical decision support recommendations to Nielsen's design heuristics.

Authors:  Kristen Miller; Muge Capan; Danielle Weldon; Yaman Noaiseh; Rebecca Kowalski; Rachel Kraft; Sanford Schwartz; William S Weintraub; Ryan Arnold
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.