Literature DB >> 22016843

Independently derived targeting of 28S rDNA by A- and D-clade R2 retrotransposons: Plasticity of integration mechanism.

Blaine K Thompson1, Shawn M Christensen.   

Abstract

Restriction-like endonuclease (RLE) bearing non-LTR retrotransposons are site-specific elements that integrate into the genome through a target primed reverse transcription mechanism (TPRT). R2 elements have been used as a model system for investigating non-LTR retrotransposon integration. We previously demonstrated that R2 retrotransposons require two subunits of the element-encoded multifunctional protein to integrate-one subunit bound upstream of the insertion site and one bound downstream. R2 elements have been phylogenetically categorized into four clades: R2-A, B, C and D, that diverged from a common ancestor more than 850 million years ago. All R2 elements target the same sequence within 28S rDNA. The amino-terminal domain of R2Bm, an R2-D clade element, contains a single zinc finger and a Myb motif that are responsible for binding R2 protein downstream of the insertion site. Target site recognition is of interest as it is the first step in the integration reaction and may help elucidate evolutionary history and integration mechanism. The amino-terminal domain of R2-A clade members contains three zinc fingers and a Myb motif. We show here that R2Lp, an R2-A clade member, uses its amino-terminal DNA binding motifs to bind upstream of the insertion site. Because the R2-A and R2-D clade elements recognize 28S rDNA differently, we conclude the A- and D-clades represent independent targeting events to the 28S site. Our results also indicate a certain plasticity of insertional mechanics exists between the two clades.

Year:  2011        PMID: 22016843      PMCID: PMC3190273          DOI: 10.4161/mge.1.1.16485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mob Genet Elements        ISSN: 2159-2543


  49 in total

1.  The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  H S Malik; W D Burke; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Identification of the endonuclease domain encoded by R2 and other site-specific, non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  J Yang; H S Malik; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 A resolution.

Authors:  N Ban; P Nissen; J Hansen; P B Moore; T A Steitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  End-to-end template jumping by the reverse transcriptase encoded by the R2 retrotransposon.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Bibillo; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Characterization of active R2 retrotransposition in the rDNA locus of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Authors:  Q Feng; J V Moran; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Human L1 element target-primed reverse transcription in vitro.

Authors:  Gregory J Cost; Qinghua Feng; Alain Jacquier; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  The missing nucleoside experiment: a new technique to study recognition of DNA by protein.

Authors:  J J Hayes; T D Tullius
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Ancient lineages of non-LTR retrotransposons in the primitive eukaryote, Giardia lamblia.

Authors:  William D Burke; Harmit S Malik; Stephen M Rich; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Non-LTR retrotransposons encoding a restriction enzyme-like endonuclease in vertebrates.

Authors:  J N Volff; C Körting; A Froschauer; K Sweeney; M Schartl
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Tania Sultana; Alessia Zamborlini; Gael Cristofari; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Targeting novel sites: The N-terminal DNA binding domain of non-LTR retrotransposons is an adaptable module that is implicated in changing site specificities.

Authors:  Haridha Shivram; Dillon Cawley; Shawn M Christensen
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 3.  Integration, Regulation, and Long-Term Stability of R2 Retrotransposons.

Authors:  Thomas H Eickbush; Danna G Eickbush
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04

4.  Evaluating different DNA binding domains to modulate L1 ORF2p-driven site-specific retrotransposition events in human cells.

Authors:  Catherine M Ade; Rebecca S Derbes; Bradley J Wagstaff; Sara B Linker; Travis B White; Dawn Deharo; Victoria P Belancio; Zoltán Ivics; Astrid M Roy-Engel
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Endonuclease domain of non-LTR retrotransposons: loss-of-function mutants and modeling of the R2Bm endonuclease.

Authors:  Aruna Govindaraju; Jeremy D Cortez; Brad Reveal; Shawn M Christensen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Non-LTR R2 element evolutionary patterns: phylogenetic incongruences, rapid radiation and the maintenance of multiple lineages.

Authors:  Andrea Luchetti; Barbara Mantovani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Randomly detected genetically modified (GM) maize (Zea mays L.) near a transport route revealed a fragile 45S rDNA phenotype.

Authors:  Nomar Espinosa Waminal; Ki Hyun Ryu; Sun-Hee Choi; Hyun Hee Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Wide Distribution and Change of Target Specificity of R2 Non-LTR Retrotransposons in Animals.

Authors:  Kenji K Kojima; Yosuke Seto; Haruhiko Fujiwara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.