Literature DB >> 10368957

The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements.

H S Malik1, W D Burke, T H Eickbush.   

Abstract

A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis was conducted of non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons based on an extended sequence alignment of their reverse transcriptase (RT) domain. The 440 amino acid positions used included a region proposed to be similar to the "thumb" of the right-handed RT structure found in retroviruses. All identified non-LTR elements could be grouped into 11 distinct clades. Using the rates of sequence change derived from studies of the vertical inheritance of R1 and R2 elements in arthropods as a comparison, we found no evidence for the horizontal transmission of non-LTR elements. Assuming vertical descent, the phylogeny suggested that non-LTR elements are as old as eukaryotes, with each of the 11 clades dating back to the Precambrian era. The analysis enabled us to propose a simple chronology for the acquisition of different enzymatic domains in the evolution of the non-LTR class of retrotransposons. The first non-LTR elements were sequence specific by virtue of a restriction-enzyme-like endonuclease located downstream of the RT domain. Evolving from this original group were elements (eight clades) that acquired an apurinic-apyrimidic endonuclease-like domain upstream of the RT domain. Finally, four of these clades have inherited an RNase H domain downstream of the RT domain. The phylogenies of the AP endonuclease and RNase H domains were also determined for this report and are consistent with the monophyletic acquisition of these domains. These studies represent the most comprehensive effort to date to trace the evolution of a major class of transposable elements.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368957     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  223 in total

1.  Transposable elements in sexual and ancient asexual taxa.

Authors:  I Arkhipova; M Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nucleic acid chaperone activity of the ORF1 protein from the mouse LINE-1 retrotransposon.

Authors:  S L Martin; F D Bushman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Identification of the endonuclease domain encoded by R2 and other site-specific, non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  J Yang; H S Malik; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Phylogenetic relationships among group II intron ORFs.

Authors:  S Zimmerly; G Hausner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Twin priming: a proposed mechanism for the creation of inversions in L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  E M Ostertag; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Genomic characterization of recent human LINE-1 insertions: evidence supporting random insertion.

Authors:  I Ovchinnikov; A B Troxel; G D Swergold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Three retrotransposon families in the genome of Giardia lamblia: two telomeric, one dead.

Authors:  I R Arkhipova; H G Morrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Transplantation of target site specificity by swapping the endonuclease domains of two LINEs.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Haruhiko Fujiwara
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Element-specific localization of Drosophila retrotransposon Gag proteins occurs in both nucleus and cytoplasm.

Authors:  S Rashkova; S E Karam; M-L Pardue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  R2 retrotransposition on assembled nucleosomes depends on the translational position of the target site.

Authors:  Junqiang Ye; Zungyoon Yang; Jeffrey J Hayes; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.