Literature DB >> 29154869

Evaluating different DNA binding domains to modulate L1 ORF2p-driven site-specific retrotransposition events in human cells.

Catherine M Ade1, Rebecca S Derbes2, Bradley J Wagstaff2, Sara B Linker3, Travis B White4, Dawn Deharo5, Victoria P Belancio5, Zoltán Ivics6, Astrid M Roy-Engel7.   

Abstract

DNA binding domains (DBDs) have been used with great success to impart targeting capabilities to a variety of proteins creating highly useful genomic tools. We evaluated the ability of five types of DBDs and strategies (AAV Rep proteins, Cre, TAL effectors, zinc finger proteins, and Cas9/gRNA system) to target the L1 ORF2 protein to drive retrotransposition of Alu inserts to specific sequences in the human genome. First, we find that the L1 ORF2 protein tolerates the addition of protein domains both at the amino- and carboxy-terminus. Although in some instances retrotransposition efficiencies slightly diminished, all fusion proteins containing an intact ORF2 were capable of driving retrotransposition. Second, the stability of individual ORF2 fusion proteins varies and difficult to predict. Third, DBDs that require the formation of multimers for target recognition are unlikely to modify targeting of ORF2p-driven insertions. Fourth, the more components needed to assemble into a complex to drive targeted retrotransposition, the less likely the strategy will increase targeted insertions. Fifth, abundance of target sequences present in the genome will likely dictate the effectiveness and efficiency of targeted insertions. Lastly, the cleavage capabilities of Cas9 (or a Cas9 nickase variant) are unable to substitute for the L1 ORF2 endonuclease domain functions, suggestive that the endonuclease domain has alternate functions needed for retrotransposition. From these studies, we conclude that the most critical component for the modification of the human L1 ORF2 protein to drive targeted insertions is the selection of the DBD due to the varying functional requirements and impacts on protein stability.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alu; DNA binding domain; Fusion protein; LINE-1; ORF2; Retrotransposition; Target site

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29154869      PMCID: PMC5734997          DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  53 in total

Review 1.  Cre recombinase: the universal reagent for genome tailoring.

Authors:  A Nagy
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Positive and negative regulation of endogenous genes by designed transcription factors.

Authors:  R R Beerli; B Dreier; C F Barbas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genomic deletions created upon LINE-1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Nicolas Gilbert; Sheila Lutz-Prigge; John V Moran
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Cre Recombinase.

Authors:  Gregory D Van Duyne
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-02

5.  LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences.

Authors:  Marie Dewannieux; Cécile Esnault; Thierry Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-03       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Gaj; Charles A Gersbach; Carlos F Barbas
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

7.  Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases.

Authors:  Dirk Hockemeyer; Haoyi Wang; Samira Kiani; Christine S Lai; Qing Gao; John P Cassady; Gregory J Cost; Lei Zhang; Yolanda Santiago; Jeffrey C Miller; Bryan Zeitler; Jennifer M Cherone; Xiangdong Meng; Sarah J Hinkley; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; John Aach; P Benjamin Stranges; Kevin M Esvelt; Mark Moosburner; Sriram Kosuri; Luhan Yang; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Determinants for DNA target structure selectivity of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon endonuclease.

Authors:  Kostas Repanas; Nora Zingler; Liliana E Layer; Gerald G Schumann; Anastassis Perrakis; Oliver Weichenrieder
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Expression and detection of LINE-1 ORF-encoded proteins.

Authors:  Lixin Dai; John LaCava; Martin S Taylor; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2014-05-22
View more
  2 in total

1.  Targeted insertion of large genetic payloads using cas directed LINE-1 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Femila Manoj; Laura W Tai; Katelyn Sun Mi Wang; Thomas E Kuhlman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Comprehensive Scanning Mutagenesis of Human Retrotransposon LINE-1 Identifies Motifs Essential for Function.

Authors:  Matthias T Ochmann; Srinjoy Sil; Emily M Adney; David M Truong; Paolo Mita; Xuya Wang; David J Kahler; David Fenyö; Liam J Holt; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.