Literature DB >> 22479684

Targeting novel sites: The N-terminal DNA binding domain of non-LTR retrotransposons is an adaptable module that is implicated in changing site specificities.

Haridha Shivram1, Dillon Cawley, Shawn M Christensen.   

Abstract

Restriction-like endonuclease (RLE) bearing non-LTR retrotransposons are site-specific elements that integrate into the genome through target primed reverse transcription (TPRT). RLE-bearing elements have been used as a model system for investigating non-LTR retrotransposon integration. R2 elements target a specific site in the 28S rDNA gene. We previously demonstrated that the two major sub-classes of R2 (R2-A and R2-D) target the R2 insertion site in an opposing manner with regard to the pairing of known DNA binding domains and bound sequences-indicating that the A- and D-clades represent independently derived modes of targeting that site. Elements have been discovered that group phylogenetically with R2 but do not target the canonical R2 site. Here we extend our earlier studies to show that a separate R2-A clade element, which targets a site other than the canonical R2 site, does so by using the N-terminal zinc fingers and Myb motifs. We further extend our targeting studies beyond R2 clade elements by investigating the ability of the N-terminal zinc fingers from the nematode NeSL-1 element to target its integration site. Our data are consistent with the use of an N-terminal DNA binding domain as one of the major targeting determinants used by RLE-bearing non-LTR retrotransposons to secure a protein subunit near the insertion site. This N-terminal DNA binding domain can undergo modifications, allowing the element to target novel sites. The binding orientation of the N-terminal domain relative to the insertion site is quite variable.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22479684      PMCID: PMC3312299          DOI: 10.4161/mge.1.3.18453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mob Genet Elements        ISSN: 2159-2543


  29 in total

1.  The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  H S Malik; W D Burke; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Identification of the endonuclease domain encoded by R2 and other site-specific, non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  J Yang; H S Malik; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Footprint of the retrotransposon R2Bm protein on its target site before and after cleavage.

Authors:  Shawn Christensen; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Identification of rDNA-specific non-LTR retrotransposons in Cnidaria.

Authors:  Kenji K Kojima; Kei-ichi Kuma; Hiroyuki Toh; Haruhiko Fujiwara
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Authors:  Q Feng; J V Moran; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  R4, a non-LTR retrotransposon specific to the large subunit rRNA genes of nematodes.

Authors:  W D Burke; F Müller; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The missing nucleoside experiment: a new technique to study recognition of DNA by protein.

Authors:  J J Hayes; T D Tullius
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Ancient lineages of non-LTR retrotransposons in the primitive eukaryote, Giardia lamblia.

Authors:  William D Burke; Harmit S Malik; Stephen M Rich; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Non-LTR retrotransposons encoding a restriction enzyme-like endonuclease in vertebrates.

Authors:  J N Volff; C Körting; A Froschauer; K Sweeney; M Schartl
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Role of the Bombyx mori R2 element N-terminal domain in the target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) reaction.

Authors:  Shawn M Christensen; Arkadiusz Bibillo; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Tania Sultana; Alessia Zamborlini; Gael Cristofari; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Integration, Regulation, and Long-Term Stability of R2 Retrotransposons.

Authors:  Thomas H Eickbush; Danna G Eickbush
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04

3.  Endonuclease domain of non-LTR retrotransposons: loss-of-function mutants and modeling of the R2Bm endonuclease.

Authors:  Aruna Govindaraju; Jeremy D Cortez; Brad Reveal; Shawn M Christensen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A Survey of Transposon Landscapes in the Putative Ancient Asexual Ostracod Darwinula stevensoni.

Authors:  Isa Schön; Fernando Rodriguez; Matthew Dunn; Koen Martens; Michael Shribak; Irina R Arkhipova
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Globular domain structure and function of restriction-like-endonuclease LINEs: similarities to eukaryotic splicing factor Prp8.

Authors:  M Murshida Mahbub; Saiful M Chowdhury; Shawn M Christensen
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2017-11-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.