Literature DB >> 22015048

Kinematic comparison of split-belt and single-belt treadmill walking and the effects of accommodation.

Allison R Altman1, Darcy S Reisman, Jill S Higginson, Irene S Davis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Instrumented treadmills are becoming increasingly more common in gait laboratories. Instrumented side-split treadmills allow the collection of forces under each foot during walking. However, there may be a tendency to increase the base of support when walking on these treadmills, influencing other frontal plane mechanics as well. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of walking on a side-split instrumented treadmill on base of gait and frontal plane kinematics of the lower extremity.
METHODS: Twenty subjects walked on both a split and a single-belt treadmill. Base of gait and frontal plane kinematic angles and variability data were recorded. A one-way ANOVA was used to determine differences between the single and split-belt conditions at baseline and following a 10 min accommodation on the split-belt. The relationships between the change in base of gait and change in each kinematic variable were also determined.
RESULTS: On average, the base of gait was 3.7 cm wider on the split-belt treadmill with a 4mm gap between belts. No significant differences were observed in the mean values of lower extremity kinematics or kinematic variability at baseline or following the 10 min accommodation. However, the increase in base of gait was significantly related to a decrease in peak knee and hip adduction angles.
CONCLUSION: The 4mm gap between the treadmill belts significantly increased the mean base of gait in all subjects. This did not alter mean frontal plane kinematics. However, as base of gait increased, the tendency towards hip and knee abduction also increased.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22015048      PMCID: PMC3274623          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  11 in total

1.  Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects.

Authors:  A Matsas; N Taylor; H McBurney
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running.

Authors:  Anne Mündermann; Benno M Nigg; Darren J Stefanyshyn; R Neil Humble
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Clinical applicability of using spherical fitting to find hip joint centers.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; James G Richards
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Patrick O Riley; Gabriele Paolini; Ugo Della Croce; Kate W Paylo; D Casey Kerrigan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Habituation to treadmill walking.

Authors:  M Van de Putte; N Hagemeister; N St-Onge; G Parent; J A de Guise
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.300

6.  Short-term relationships between footstep variables in young adults.

Authors:  Meg E Morris; Belinda Bilney; Thomas A Matyas; Gregory W Dalton
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.

Authors:  J A Zeni; J G Richards; J S Higginson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Familiarisation to treadmill walking in unimpaired older people.

Authors:  Erin Wass; Nicholas F Taylor; Angelo Matsas
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Gait parameters and stride-to-stride variability during familiarization to walking on a split-belt treadmill.

Authors:  Joseph A Zeni; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system (GAITRite).

Authors:  Cornelis J T van Uden; Marcus P Besser
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  5 in total

1.  Methodological aspects of EEG and body dynamics measurements during motion.

Authors:  Pedro M R Reis; Felix Hebenstreit; Florian Gabsteiger; Vinzenz von Tscharner; Matthias Lochmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Locomotor sensory organization test: a novel paradigm for the assessment of sensory contributions in gait.

Authors:  Jung Hung Chien; Diderik-Jan Anthony Eikema; Mukul Mukherjee; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Predicting the metabolic cost of incline walking from muscle activity and walking mechanics.

Authors:  Amy Silder; Thor Besier; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Perceptual-motor styles.

Authors:  Pierre-Paul Vidal; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Comparison of sagittal plane gait characteristics between the overground and treadmill approach for gait analysis in typically developing children.

Authors:  Rachel Senden; Rik Marcellis; Kenneth Meijer; Paul Willems; Ton Lenssen; Heleen Staal; Yvonne Janssen; Vincent Groen; Roland Jeroen Vermeulen; Marianne Witlox
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.061

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.