Literature DB >> 12127185

Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running.

Anne Mündermann1, Benno M Nigg, Darren J Stefanyshyn, R Neil Humble.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were: (a) to determine whether subjects are able to distinguish between differences in footwear with respect to footwear comfort; and (b) to determine how reliably footwear comfort can be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a protocol including a control condition during running. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between comfort ratings for repeated conditions were high (ICC = 0.799). Differences in comfort ratings between the insert conditions were significant. A paired t-test revealed a significant difference in overall comfort ratings for the control insert when tested after the soft insert compared to when tested after the hard insert (P = 0.008). The results of this study showed that VASs provide a reliable measure to assess footwear comfort during running under the conditions that: (a) a control condition is included; and (b) the average comfort rating of sessions 4-6 is used. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12127185     DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00197-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  25 in total

1.  Kinematic comparison of split-belt and single-belt treadmill walking and the effects of accommodation.

Authors:  Allison R Altman; Darcy S Reisman; Jill S Higginson; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Impact reduction during running: efficiency of simple acute interventions in recreational runners.

Authors:  Marlène Giandolini; Pierrick J Arnal; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicolas Peyrot; Pierre Samozino; Blaise Dubois; Jean-Benoît Morin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison of cardiovascular and biomechanical parameters of supine lower body negative pressure and upright lower body positive pressure to simulate activity in 1/6 G and 3/8 G.

Authors:  Thomas Schlabs; Armando Rosales-Velderrain; Heidi Ruckstuhl; Alexander C Stahn; Alan R Hargens
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-05-02

4.  Effect of the Innovative Running Shoes With the Special Midsole Structure on the Female Runners' Lower Limb Biomechanics.

Authors:  Fengqin Fu; Lianming Guo; Xunfei Tang; Jiayu Wang; Zhihao Xie; Gusztáv Fekete; Yuhui Cai; Qiuli Hu; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  CAN RUNNERS PERCEIVE CHANGES IN HEEL CUSHIONING AS THE SHOE AGES WITH INCREASED MILEAGE?

Authors:  Mark W Cornwall; Thomas G McPoil
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

Review 6.  Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: assessments and treatment options.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Jody L Riskowski; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.098

7.  Somatosensory Perception of Running Shoe Mass may be influenced by Extended Wearing Time or Inclusion of a Personal Reference Shoe, Depending on Testing Method.

Authors:  James G Saxton; Benjamin R Mardis; Christopher L Kliethermes; David S Senchina
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

8.  Acute intense fatigue does not modify the effect of EVA and TPU custom foot orthoses on running mechanics, running economy and perceived comfort.

Authors:  Ken Van Alsenoy; Joong Hyun Ryu; Olivier Girard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Efficacy of customised foot orthoses in the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: study protocol for a randomised trial.

Authors:  Shannon E Munteanu; Karl B Landorf; Hylton B Menz; Jill L Cook; Tania Pizzari; Lisa A Scott
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Children should be seen and also heard: an explorative qualitative study into the influences on children's choice of footwear, their perception of comfort and the language they use to describe footwear experiences.

Authors:  Carina Price; Sue Skidmore; Jane Ratcliffe; Anita Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.