Literature DB >> 16139749

Clinical applicability of using spherical fitting to find hip joint centers.

Jennifer L Hicks1, James G Richards.   

Abstract

The functional or sphere-fitting method has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional predictive approach to locating hip centers based on inter-ASIS breadth. In the functional approach, the movement of a marker on the thigh is fit to a sphere whose center coincides with the hip joint center. The first objective of this study was to determine the required parameters that allow an accurate application of a sphere-fitting method. The parameters examined in this study included: (1) the range of motion in flexion-extension and abduction-adduction, (2) the specific algorithm used to fit a sphere to the data, (3) the method of placing markers on the thigh, and (4) the type of motion used to generate points, either walking or a standing leg motion (SLM) trial. This objective was addressed with a computer simulation and clinical data. The second objective was to compare the accuracy of the functional method to the traditional predictive approach in a group of nine human subjects. The location of the hip center estimates from both methods were compared to an ultrasound-determined hip center standard, and linear errors and errors along each axis were compared. Results from the computer simulation indicated that an iterative algorithm is needed, with a method using the derivative yielding slightly more accurate results. Clinical results indicated that the functional method with a standing leg motion trial produced significantly smaller errors in hip joint center estimates (1.34 cm) versus the predictive method (2.16 cm). In addition, the range of error across hips was smaller for the functional method. If high joint center accuracy is needed or in populations characterized by obesity or pelvic asymmetries, the subject specificity and independence from anatomical landmarks characteristic of the functional method would likely provide more accurate results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16139749     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  18 in total

1.  Gait retraining to reduce the knee adduction moment through real-time visual feedback of dynamic knee alignment.

Authors:  Joaquin A Barrios; Kay M Crossley; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The accuracy of the use of functional hip motions on localization of the center of the hip.

Authors:  Andrew D Speirs; Daniel L Benoit; Mélanie L Beaulieu; Mario Lamontagne; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-07

3.  Kinematic comparison of split-belt and single-belt treadmill walking and the effects of accommodation.

Authors:  Allison R Altman; Darcy S Reisman; Jill S Higginson; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fellin; Kurt Manal; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  In vitro validation and reliability study of electromagnetic skin sensors for evaluation of end range of motion positions of the hip.

Authors:  E A Audenaert; L Vigneron; T Van Hoof; K D'Herde; G van Maele; D Oosterlinck; C Pattyn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Hip joint center localisation: A biomechanical application to hip arthroplasty population.

Authors:  Vicky Bouffard; Mickael Begon; Annick Champagne; Payam Farhadnia; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

7.  In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Are mechanics different between male and female runners with patellofemoral pain?

Authors:  Richard W Willy; Kurt T Manal; Erik E Witvrouw; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Static and dynamic correlates of the knee adduction moment in healthy knees ranging from normal to varus-aligned.

Authors:  Joaquin A Barrios; Jill S Higginson; Todd D Royer; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Mirror gait retraining for the treatment of patellofemoral pain in female runners.

Authors:  Richard W Willy; John P Scholz; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.