Literature DB >> 17723303

Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.

J A Zeni1, J G Richards, J S Higginson.   

Abstract

The determination of gait events such as heel strike and toe-off provide the basis for defining stance and swing phases of gait cycles. Two algorithms for determining event times for treadmill and overground walking based solely on kinematic data are presented. Kinematic data from treadmill walking trials lasting 20-45s were collected from three subject populations (healthy young, n=7; multiple sclerosis, n=7; stroke, n=4). Overground walking trials consisted of approximately eight successful passes over two force plates for a healthy subject population (n=5). Time of heel strike and toe-off were determined using the two new computational techniques and compared to events detected using vertical ground reaction force (GRF) as a gold standard. The two algorithms determined 94% of the treadmill events from healthy subjects within one frame (0.0167s) of the GRF events. In the impaired populations, 89% of treadmill events were within two frames (0.0334s) of the GRF events. For overground trials, 98% of events were within two frames. Automatic event detection from the two kinematic-based algorithms will aid researchers by accurately determining gait events during the analysis of treadmill and overground walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17723303      PMCID: PMC2384115          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  10 in total

1.  Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data.

Authors:  A Hreljac; R N Marshall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Validity and reliability of a kinematic protocol for determining foot contact events.

Authors:  J Mickelborough; M L van der Linden; J Richards; A R Ennos
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Phase determination during normal running using kinematic data.

Authors:  A Hreljac; N Stergiou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A simple method for determination of gait events.

Authors:  Andrew H Hansen; Dudley S Childress; Margrit R Meier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes.

Authors:  Kamiar Aminian; B Najafi; C Büla; P-F Leyvraz; Ph Robert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals.

Authors:  Salim Ghoussayni; Christopher Stevens; Sally Durham; David Ewins
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Gait reaction reconstruction and a heel strike algorithm.

Authors:  G W Brodland; A B Thornton-Trump
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Footswitch system for measurement of the temporal parameters of gait.

Authors:  J M Hausdorff; Z Ladin; J Y Wei
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A new method to measure foot contact.

Authors:  J Nilsson; V P Stokes; A Thorstensson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  A practical gait analysis system using gyroscopes.

Authors:  K Tong; M H Granat
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.242

  10 in total
  234 in total

1.  Gait retraining to reduce the knee adduction moment through real-time visual feedback of dynamic knee alignment.

Authors:  Joaquin A Barrios; Kay M Crossley; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Stability control during the performance of a simultaneous obstacle avoidance and auditory Stroop task.

Authors:  Timothy A Worden; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Lower extremity kinematics of cross-slope roof walking.

Authors:  Scott P Breloff; Chip Wade; Dwight E Waddell
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fellin; William C Rose; Todd D Royer; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Age and falls history effects on antagonist leg muscle coactivation during walking with balance perturbations.

Authors:  Jessica D Thompson; Prudence Plummer; Jason R Franz
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Proprioceptive feedback contributes to the adaptation toward an economical gait pattern.

Authors:  Jill E Hubbuch; Blake W Bennett; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Different Error Size During Locomotor Adaptation Affects Transfer to Overground Walking Poststroke.

Authors:  Carolina C Alcântara; Charalambos C Charalambous; Susanne M Morton; Thiago L Russo; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Tarun Kalyanaraman; Peter G Adamczyk; Edward S Claflin; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Gait parameters and stride-to-stride variability during familiarization to walking on a split-belt treadmill.

Authors:  Joseph A Zeni; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Hip proprioceptive feedback influences the control of mediolateral stability during human walking.

Authors:  Devin C Roden-Reynolds; Megan H Walker; Camille R Wasserman; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.