Literature DB >> 19075203

Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years.

Anna N A Tosteson1, Jon D Lurie, Tor D Tosteson, Jonathan S Skinner, Harry Herkowitz, Todd Albert, Scott D Boden, Keith Bridwell, Michael Longley, Gunnar B Andersson, Emily A Blood, Margaret R Grove, James N Weinstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The SPORT (Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial) reported favorable surgery outcomes over 2 years among patients with stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis, but the economic value of these surgeries is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term cost-effectiveness of spine surgery relative to nonoperative care for stenosis alone and for stenosis with spondylolisthesis.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. DATA SOURCES: Resource utilization, productivity, and EuroQol EQ-5D score measured at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment among SPORT participants. TARGET POPULATION: Patients with image-confirmed spinal stenosis, with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis. TIME HORIZON: 2 years. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. INTERVENTION: Nonoperative care or surgery (primarily decompressive laminectomy for stenosis and decompressive laminectomy with fusion for stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis). OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Among 634 patients with stenosis, 394 (62%) had surgery, most often decompressive laminectomy (320 of 394 [81%]). Stenosis surgeries improved health to a greater extent than nonoperative care (QALY gain, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.22]) at a cost of $77,600 (CI, $49,600 to $120,000) per QALY gained. Among 601 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, 368 (61%) had surgery, most including fusion (344 of 368 [93%]) and most with instrumentation (269 of 344 [78%]). Degenerative spondylolisthesis surgeries significantly improved health versus nonoperative care (QALY gain, 0.23 [CI, 0.19 to 0.27]), at a cost of $115,600 (CI, $90,800 to $144,900) per QALY gained. RESULT OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Surgery cost markedly affected the value of surgery. LIMITATION: The study used self-reported utilization data, 2-year time horizon, and as-treated analysis to address treatment nonadherence among randomly assigned participants.
CONCLUSION: The economic value of spinal stenosis surgery at 2 years compares favorably with many health interventions. Degenerative spondylolisthesis surgery is not highly cost-effective over 2 years but could show value over a longer time horizon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19075203      PMCID: PMC2658642          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  21 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K M Kuntz; R K Snider; J N Weinstein; M H Pope; J N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Examining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: comparing results of randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions for low back pain.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; George Tomlinson; Alejandro Alex R Jadad; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.

Authors:  A Laupacis; D Feeny; A S Detsky; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Cost-of-illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures.

Authors:  T A Hodgson; M R Meiners
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1982

6.  Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  J N Katz; S J Lipson; R A Lew; L J Grobler; J N Weinstein; G W Brick; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis.

Authors:  Martin B Kornblum; Jeffrey S Fischgrund; Harry N Herkowitz; David A Abraham; David L Berkower; Jeff S Ditkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wilbert B van den Hout; Wilco C Peul; Bart W Koes; Ronald Brand; Job Kievit; Ralph T W M Thomeer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-23

9.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R W Chang; J M Pellisier; G B Hazen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Design of the Spine Patient outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Nancy J O Birkmeyer; James N Weinstein; Anna N A Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Jonathan S Skinner; Jon D Lurie; Richard Deyo; John E Wennberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Louise H Anderson; Teresa Nelson; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-09

4.  A longitudinal comparison of 5 preference-weighted health state classification systems in persons with intervertebral disk herniation.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Alan M Jette; Margaret R Grove; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients.

Authors:  Belinda L Udeh; Shrif Costandi; Jarrod E Dalton; Raktim Ghosh; Hani Yousef; Nagy Mekhail
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Kristen Radcliff; Mark Kurd; Jon Lurie; Emily Blood; Todd J Albert; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Christoph P Hofstetter; Anna S Hofer; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

8.  Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: projected cost effectiveness at 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jamie Terran; Brian J McHugh; Charla R Fischer; Baron Lonner; Daniel Warren; Steven Glassman; Keith Bridwell; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

9.  Comparative effectiveness and health care spending--implications for reform.

Authors:  Milton C Weinstein; Jonathan A Skinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Long-term health care utilisation and costs after spinal fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Cody Bünger; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.