BACKGROUND: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) evaluated the effects of surgery versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (IDH), among other pathologies. Multiple subgroup analyses have been completed since the initial publications, which have further defined which patient factors lead to better or worse patient-reported outcomes; however, the degree to which these factors influence patient-reported outcomes has not been explored. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We reviewed the subgroup analyses of the SPORT IDH studies to answer the following questions: (1) What factors predicted improvement in patient-reported outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of lumbar IDH? (2) What factors predicted worse patient-reported outcomes compared to baseline after operative or nonoperative treatment of lumbar IDH? And (3) what factors influenced patient-reported outcomes of surgery in patients with lumbar IDH? METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE(®) search to identify the subgroup analyses of the SPORT IDH data that were responsive to our study questions. Eleven articles were identified that met our search criteria. RESULTS: The patient factors associated with larger improvements in Oswestry Disability Index at 4 years with either surgical or nonoperative treatment included a higher baseline Oswestry Disability Index, BMI of less than 30, not being depressed, being insured, having no litigation pending, not having workers compensation, and having symptoms for less than 6 weeks, though there were others. Factors leading to improvement with surgical treatment were mostly related to anatomic characteristics of the disc herniation such as posterolateral and sequestered herniations. There were no patient or clinical factors identified that were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes compared to baseline after either operative or nonoperative treatment. At 2-year followup, the treatment effects were greater for those patients with upper-level herniations, patients not receiving workers compensation, and nondiabetic patients. In a 4-year multivariate analysis, being married, without joint problems, and having worse symptoms at baseline resulted in greater treatment effect with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients with IDH will likely see improvement with either surgical or nonoperative treatment, there are patient-related factors that can help predict which subgroups will demonstrate a greater improvement with surgery, such as not having joint problems, being married, having worsening symptoms at baseline, and not having diabetes. These results can help providers and patients when discussing treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) evaluated the effects of surgery versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (IDH), among other pathologies. Multiple subgroup analyses have been completed since the initial publications, which have further defined which patient factors lead to better or worse patient-reported outcomes; however, the degree to which these factors influence patient-reported outcomes has not been explored. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We reviewed the subgroup analyses of the SPORT IDH studies to answer the following questions: (1) What factors predicted improvement in patient-reported outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of lumbar IDH? (2) What factors predicted worse patient-reported outcomes compared to baseline after operative or nonoperative treatment of lumbar IDH? And (3) what factors influenced patient-reported outcomes of surgery in patients with lumbar IDH? METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE(®) search to identify the subgroup analyses of the SPORT IDH data that were responsive to our study questions. Eleven articles were identified that met our search criteria. RESULTS: The patient factors associated with larger improvements in Oswestry Disability Index at 4 years with either surgical or nonoperative treatment included a higher baseline Oswestry Disability Index, BMI of less than 30, not being depressed, being insured, having no litigation pending, not having workers compensation, and having symptoms for less than 6 weeks, though there were others. Factors leading to improvement with surgical treatment were mostly related to anatomic characteristics of the disc herniation such as posterolateral and sequestered herniations. There were no patient or clinical factors identified that were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes compared to baseline after either operative or nonoperative treatment. At 2-year followup, the treatment effects were greater for those patients with upper-level herniations, patients not receiving workers compensation, and nondiabeticpatients. In a 4-year multivariate analysis, being married, without joint problems, and having worse symptoms at baseline resulted in greater treatment effect with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients with IDH will likely see improvement with either surgical or nonoperative treatment, there are patient-related factors that can help predict which subgroups will demonstrate a greater improvement with surgery, such as not having joint problems, being married, having worsening symptoms at baseline, and not having diabetes. These results can help providers and patients when discussing treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Mitchell K Freedman; Alan S Hilibrand; Emily A Blood; Wenyan Zhao; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro; Christina V Oleson; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Jonathan S Skinner; Brett Hanscom; Anna N A Tosteson; Harry Herkowitz; Jeffrey Fischgrund; Frank P Cammisa; Todd Albert; Richard A Deyo Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-11-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Kristen Radcliff; Mark Kurd; Jon Lurie; Emily Blood; Todd J Albert; James N Weinstein Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Steven J Atlas; Tor D Tosteson; Emily A Blood; Jonathan S Skinner; Glenn S Pransky; James N Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Atman Desai; Perry A Ball; Kimon Bekelis; Jon D Lurie; Sohail K Mirza; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2011-03-04
Authors: Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Tamara S Morgan; William A Abdu; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Anne G Copay; Steven D Glassman; Brian R Subach; Sigurd Berven; Thomas C Schuler; Leah Y Carreon Journal: Spine J Date: 2008-01-16 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Adam M Pearson; Emily A Blood; John W Frymoyer; Harry Herkowitz; William A Abdu; Randy Woodward; Michael Longley; Sanford E Emery; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: J D Lurie; S C Faucett; B Hanscom; T D Tosteson; P A Ball; W A Abdu; J W Frymoyer; J N Weinstein Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily A Blood; William A Abdu; Harry Herkowitz; Alan Hilibrand; Todd Albert; Jeffrey Fischgrund Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ioannis D Gelalis; Evangelos I Papanastasiou; Emilios E Pakos; Avraam Ploumis; Dimitrios Papadopoulos; Maria Mantzari; Ioannis S Gkiatas; Marios D Vekris; Anastasios V Korompilias Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2018-12-06
Authors: J Alex Sielatycki; Silky Chotai; David Stonko; Joseph Wick; Harrison Kay; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Pradeep Suri; Adam M Pearson; Emily A Scherer; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein Journal: PM R Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Pradeep Suri; Adam M Pearson; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Emily A Scherer; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Victoria D Vuong; Ankit I Mehta; Raul A Vasquez; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2017-04-06
Authors: Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Nan Luo; Sze Yung Chin; Eugene Tze Chun Lau; Pei Wang; Naresh Kumar; Leok-Lim Lau; John Nathaniel Ruiz; Joseph Shanthakumar Thambiah; Ka-Po Gabriel Liu; Hee-Kit Wong Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2017-05-31
Authors: Bastiaan C Ter Meulen; Esther T Maas; Amrita Vyas; Marinus van der Vegt; Koo de Priester; Michiel R de Boer; Maurits W van Tulder; Henry C Weinstein; Raymond W J G Ostelo Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 2.362