Literature DB >> 24818737

Which Variables Are Associated With Patient-reported Outcomes After Discectomy? Review of SPORT Disc Herniation Studies.

John D Koerner1, Jordan Glaser, Kristen Radcliff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) evaluated the effects of surgery versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (IDH), among other pathologies. Multiple subgroup analyses have been completed since the initial publications, which have further defined which patient factors lead to better or worse patient-reported outcomes; however, the degree to which these factors influence patient-reported outcomes has not been explored. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We reviewed the subgroup analyses of the SPORT IDH studies to answer the following questions: (1) What factors predicted improvement in patient-reported outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of lumbar IDH? (2) What factors predicted worse patient-reported outcomes compared to baseline after operative or nonoperative treatment of lumbar IDH? And (3) what factors influenced patient-reported outcomes of surgery in patients with lumbar IDH?
METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE(®) search to identify the subgroup analyses of the SPORT IDH data that were responsive to our study questions. Eleven articles were identified that met our search criteria.
RESULTS: The patient factors associated with larger improvements in Oswestry Disability Index at 4 years with either surgical or nonoperative treatment included a higher baseline Oswestry Disability Index, BMI of less than 30, not being depressed, being insured, having no litigation pending, not having workers compensation, and having symptoms for less than 6 weeks, though there were others. Factors leading to improvement with surgical treatment were mostly related to anatomic characteristics of the disc herniation such as posterolateral and sequestered herniations. There were no patient or clinical factors identified that were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes compared to baseline after either operative or nonoperative treatment. At 2-year followup, the treatment effects were greater for those patients with upper-level herniations, patients not receiving workers compensation, and nondiabetic patients. In a 4-year multivariate analysis, being married, without joint problems, and having worse symptoms at baseline resulted in greater treatment effect with surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: While most patients with IDH will likely see improvement with either surgical or nonoperative treatment, there are patient-related factors that can help predict which subgroups will demonstrate a greater improvement with surgery, such as not having joint problems, being married, having worsening symptoms at baseline, and not having diabetes. These results can help providers and patients when discussing treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24818737      PMCID: PMC4419016          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3671-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  The impact of diabetes on the outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients in the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Mitchell K Freedman; Alan S Hilibrand; Emily A Blood; Wenyan Zhao; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro; Christina V Oleson; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Jonathan S Skinner; Brett Hanscom; Anna N A Tosteson; Harry Herkowitz; Jeffrey Fischgrund; Frank P Cammisa; Todd Albert; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Kristen Radcliff; Mark Kurd; Jon Lurie; Emily Blood; Todd J Albert; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The impact of workers' compensation on outcomes of surgical and nonoperative therapy for patients with a lumbar disc herniation: SPORT.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Tor D Tosteson; Emily A Blood; Jonathan S Skinner; Glenn S Pransky; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Outcomes after incidental durotomy during first-time lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Atman Desai; Perry A Ball; Kimon Bekelis; Jon D Lurie; Sohail K Mirza; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-03-04

6.  Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Tamara S Morgan; William A Abdu; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Steven D Glassman; Brian R Subach; Sigurd Berven; Thomas C Schuler; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain: does treatment, location, or morphology matter?

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Emily A Blood; John W Frymoyer; Harry Herkowitz; William A Abdu; Randy Woodward; Michael Longley; Sanford E Emery; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lumbar discectomy outcomes vary by herniation level in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  J D Lurie; S C Faucett; B Hanscom; T D Tosteson; P A Ball; W A Abdu; J W Frymoyer; J N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily A Blood; William A Abdu; Harry Herkowitz; Alan Hilibrand; Todd Albert; Jeffrey Fischgrund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes after lumbar spine microdiscectomy: a 5-year follow-up prospective study in 100 patients.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Evangelos I Papanastasiou; Emilios E Pakos; Avraam Ploumis; Dimitrios Papadopoulos; Maria Mantzari; Ioannis S Gkiatas; Marios D Vekris; Anastasios V Korompilias
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-06

2.  Risk Factors for Failing to Reach a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

Authors:  Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Is obesity associated with worse patient-reported outcomes following lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions?

Authors:  J Alex Sielatycki; Silky Chotai; David Stonko; Joseph Wick; Harrison Kay; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of an unfavorable outcome 1.5 and 12 years after a first, uncomplicated lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Karin Pieber; Nora Salomon; Silke Inschlag; Gabriele Amtmann; Karl-Ludwig Resch; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does reduction in sciatica symptoms precede improvement in disability and physical health among those treated surgically for intervertebral disc herniation? Analysis of temporal patterns in data from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Emily A Scherer; Stephen T Wegener; Tor D Tosteson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Recurrence of Pain After Usual Nonoperative Care for Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: Analysis of Data From the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; Adam M Pearson; Emily A Scherer; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Pain Recurrence After Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; Adam M Pearson; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Emily A Scherer; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Effect of Social Support and Marital Status on Perceived Surgical Effectiveness and 30-Day Hospital Readmission.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Victoria D Vuong; Ankit I Mehta; Raul A Vasquez; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06

9.  The Predictive Value of Preoperative Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores on Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Scores in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Nan Luo; Sze Yung Chin; Eugene Tze Chun Lau; Pei Wang; Naresh Kumar; Leok-Lim Lau; John Nathaniel Ruiz; Joseph Shanthakumar Thambiah; Ka-Po Gabriel Liu; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-05-31

10.  Treatment of acute sciatica with transforaminal epidural corticosteroids and local anesthetic: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bastiaan C Ter Meulen; Esther T Maas; Amrita Vyas; Marinus van der Vegt; Koo de Priester; Michiel R de Boer; Maurits W van Tulder; Henry C Weinstein; Raymond W J G Ostelo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.