Literature DB >> 22011635

Development and validation of an instrument to predict functional recovery in tibial fracture patients: the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire.

Jason W Busse1, Mohit Bhandari, Gordon H Guyatt, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Abhaya V Kulkarni, Scott Mandel, David Sanders, Emil Schemitsch, Mark Swiontkowski, Paul Tornetta, Eugene Wai, Stephen D Walter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of patients' beliefs in their likelihood of recovery from severe physical trauma.
METHODS: We developed and validated an instrument designed to capture the impact of patients' beliefs on functional recovery from injury: the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire. At 6-weeks postsurgical fixation, we administered the SPOC questionnaire to 359 consecutive patients with operatively managed tibial shaft fractures. We constructed multivariable regression models to explore the association between SPOC scores and functional outcome at 1 year as measured by return to work and Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary and mental component summary scores.
RESULTS: In our adjusted multivariable regression models that included preinjury SF-36 scores, SPOC scores at 6 weeks postsurgery accounted for 18% of the variation in SF-36 physical component summary scores and 18% of SF-36 mental component summary scores at 1 year. In both models, 6-week SPOC scores were a far more powerful predictor of functional recovery than age, gender, fracture type, smoking status, or the presence of multitrauma. Our adjusted analysis found that for each 14-point increment in SPOC score at 6 weeks (14 chosen on the basis of half a standard deviation of the mean SPOC score), the odds of returning to work at 1 year decreased by 40% (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.73).
CONCLUSION: The SPOC questionnaire is a valid measurement of illness beliefs in patients with tibial fracture and is highly predictive of their long-term functional recovery. Future research should explore if these results extend to other trauma populations and if modification of unhelpful illness beliefs is feasible and would result in improved functional outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22011635      PMCID: PMC3263327          DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822421e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  47 in total

1.  Mortality risk after hip fracture. 2003.

Authors:  Jeffrey Richmond; Gina B Aharonoff; Joseph D Zuckerman; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale--preliminary report.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; R S Lipman; L Covi
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1973-01

4.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

Authors:  B Kirshner; G Guyatt
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

5.  Development of a fatigue scale.

Authors:  T Chalder; G Berelowitz; T Pawlikowska; L Watts; S Wessely; D Wright; E P Wallace
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Factors predicting healing complications in femoral neck fractures. 138 patients followed for 2 years.

Authors:  L T Nilsson; A Johansson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-04

8.  Outcomes after treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures.

Authors:  Andrew N Pollak; Melissa L McCarthy; R Shay Bess; Julie Agel; Marc F Swiontkowski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Prediction of disturbed healing in femoral neck fracture. Radiographic analysis of 149 cases.

Authors:  A Alho; J G Benterud; H Rønningen; A Høiseth
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-12

10.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  Patient coping and expectations about recovery predict the development of chronic post-surgical pain after traumatic tibial fracture repair.

Authors:  J S Khan; P J Devereaux; Y LeManach; J W Busse
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Cindy Malachowski; Mostafa Kamal El Din; Sohail M Mulla; Luis Montoya; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

3.  Ethnic differences in patients' perceptions towards isolated orthopedic injuries: a pilot study.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Gurpreet Singh; Deanna L Kitchen; Roberto J Fajardo; Mohit Bhandari; Melissa A Valerio
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2017-11-07

Review 4.  Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review.

Authors:  Annemieke C Scholten; Juanita A Haagsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ed F van Beeck; Suzanne Polinder
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2017-03-14

5.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Transmural Trauma Care Model investigated in a multicenter trial with a controlled before-and-after design: A study protocol.

Authors:  Julia Ratter; Suzanne Wiertsema; Johanna M van Dongen; Edwin Geleijn; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Vincent de Groot; Frank W Bloemers
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2021-01-21

6.  Smoking, Obesity, and Disability Benefits or Litigation Are Not Associated with Clinically Important Reductions in Physical Functioning After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Fawaz Findakli; Jason W Busse; Emil H Schemitsch; Eva Lonn; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Predictors of return to work following motor vehicle related orthopaedic trauma.

Authors:  Darnel F Murgatroyd; Ian A Harris; Yvonne Tran; Ian D Cameron; Darnel Murgatroyd
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The course of health status and (health-related) quality of life following fracture of the lower extremity: a 6-month follow-up study.

Authors:  M A C Van Son; J De Vries; J A Roukema; T Gosens; M H J Verhofstad; B L Den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Trajectories in quality of life of patients with a fracture of the distal radius or ankle using latent class analysis.

Authors:  M A C Van Son; J De Vries; W Zijlstra; J A Roukema; T Gosens; M H J Verhofstad; B L Den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathan N O'Hara; Marckenley Isaac; Gerard P Slobogean; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.