Literature DB >> 14563795

Outcomes after treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures.

Andrew N Pollak1, Melissa L McCarthy, R Shay Bess, Julie Agel, Marc F Swiontkowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although a number of investigators have documented clinical outcomes and complications associated with tibial plafond, or pilon, fractures, very few have examined functional and general health outcomes associated with these fractures. Our purpose was to assess midterm health, function, and impairment after pilon fractures and to examine patient, injury, and treatment characteristics that influence outcome.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of pilon fractures treated at two centers between 1994 and 1995 was conducted. Patient, injury, and treatment characteristics were recorded from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. Study participants returned to the initial treatment centers for a comprehensive evaluation of their health status. The primary outcomes that were measured included general health, walking ability, limitation of range of motion, pain, and stair-climbing ability. A secondary outcome measure was employment status.
RESULTS: Eighty (78%) of 103 eligible patients were evaluated at a mean of 3.2 years after injury. General health, as measured with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), was significantly poorer than age and gender-matched norms. Thirty-five percent of the patients reported substantial ankle stiffness; 29%, persistent swelling; and 33%, ongoing pain. Of sixty-five participants who had been employed before the injury, twenty-eight (43%) were not employed at the time of follow-up; nineteen (68%) of the twenty-eight reported that the pilon fracture prevented them from working. Multivariate analyses revealed that presence of two or more comorbidities, being married, having an annual personal income of less than 25,000 US dollars, not having attained a high-school diploma, and having been treated with external fixation with or without limited internal fixation were significantly related to poorer results as reflected by at least two of the five primary outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: At more than three years after the injury, pilon fractures can have persistent and devastating consequences on patients' health and well-being. Certain social, demographic, and treatment variables seem to contribute to these poor outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14563795     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  45 in total

1.  Pilon fractures.

Authors:  John Scolaro; Jaimo Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Development and validation of an instrument to predict functional recovery in tibial fracture patients: the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari; Gordon H Guyatt; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Scott Mandel; David Sanders; Emil Schemitsch; Mark Swiontkowski; Paul Tornetta; Eugene Wai; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following external fixation or open reduction internal fixation for distal intra-articular tibial fractures: an update.

Authors:  J L Erichsen; P I Andersen; B Viberg; C Jensen; F Damborg; L Froberg
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-09

4.  Outcome of 28 open pilon fractures with injury severity-based fixation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Danoff; Comron Saifi; David C Goodspeed; J Spence Reid
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-26

5.  Fracture reduction and primary ankle arthrodesis: a reliable approach for severely comminuted tibial pilon fracture.

Authors:  Douglas N Beaman; Richard Gellman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Can MRI accurately detect pilon articular malreduction? A quantitative comparison between CT and 3T MRI bone models.

Authors:  Shairah Radzi; Constantin Edmond Dlaska; Gary Cowin; Mark Robinson; Jit Pratap; Michael Andreas Schuetz; Sanjay Mishra; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

7.  Do Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Improve After Pilon Fracture in Patients Who Use the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis?

Authors:  Michael Quacinella; Ethan Bernstein; Brittney Mazzone; Marilynn Wyatt; Kevin M Kuhn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Risk factors of deep infection in operatively treated pilon fractures (AO/OTA: 43).

Authors:  Cesar S Molina; Daniel J Stinner; Andrew R Fras; Jason M Evans
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-21

9.  Clinical outcome and changes in gait pattern after pilon fractures.

Authors:  Hendrik Jansen; Annabel Fenwick; Stefanie Doht; Soenke Frey; Rainer Meffert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Management of distal tibial intra-articular fractures with circular external fixation.

Authors:  G Lovisetti; M A Agus; F Pace; D Capitani; F Sala
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2009-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.