BACKGROUND: Previous research has found an 80% return-to-work rate in mid-income white breast cancer survivors, but little is known about the employment trajectory of low-income minorities or whites. We set out to compare the trajectories of low-income Latina and non-Latina white survivors and to identify correlates of employment status. METHODS: Participants were low-income women who had localized breast cancer, spoke English or Spanish, and were employed at the time of diagnosis. Interviews were conducted 6, 18, and 36 months after diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent correlates of employment status at 18 months. RESULTS: Of 290 participants, 62% were Latina. Latinas were less likely than non-Latina whites to be working 6 months (27% vs 49%; P = .0002) and 18 months (45% vs 59%; P = .02) after diagnosis, but at 36 months there was no significant difference (53% vs 59%; P = .29). Latinas were more likely to be manual laborers than were non-Latina whites (P < .0001). Baseline job type and receipt of axillary node dissection were associated with employment status among Latinas but not non-Latina whites. CONCLUSIONS: Neither low-income Latinas nor non-Latina whites approached the 80% rate of return to work seen in wealthier white populations. Latinas followed a protracted return-to-work trajectory compared to non-Latina whites, and differences in job type appear to have played an important role. Manual laborers may be disproportionately impacted by surgical procedures that limit physical activity. This can inform the development of rehabilitative interventions and may have important implications for the surgical and postsurgical management of patients.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has found an 80% return-to-work rate in mid-income white breast cancer survivors, but little is known about the employment trajectory of low-income minorities or whites. We set out to compare the trajectories of low-income Latina and non-Latina white survivors and to identify correlates of employment status. METHODS:Participants were low-income women who had localized breast cancer, spoke English or Spanish, and were employed at the time of diagnosis. Interviews were conducted 6, 18, and 36 months after diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent correlates of employment status at 18 months. RESULTS: Of 290 participants, 62% were Latina. Latinas were less likely than non-Latina whites to be working 6 months (27% vs 49%; P = .0002) and 18 months (45% vs 59%; P = .02) after diagnosis, but at 36 months there was no significant difference (53% vs 59%; P = .29). Latinas were more likely to be manual laborers than were non-Latina whites (P < .0001). Baseline job type and receipt of axillary node dissection were associated with employment status among Latinas but not non-Latina whites. CONCLUSIONS: Neither low-income Latinas nor non-Latina whites approached the 80% rate of return to work seen in wealthier white populations. Latinas followed a protracted return-to-work trajectory compared to non-Latina whites, and differences in job type appear to have played an important role. Manual laborers may be disproportionately impacted by surgical procedures that limit physical activity. This can inform the development of rehabilitative interventions and may have important implications for the surgical and postsurgical management of patients.
Authors: Patricia A Ganz; Katherine A Desmond; Beth Leedham; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Thomas R Belin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-01-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Limin X Clegg; Elizabeth Ward; Lynn A G Ries; Xiaocheng Wu; Patricia M Jamison; Phyllis A Wingo; Holly L Howe; Robert N Anderson; Brenda K Edwards Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mahasin S Mujahid; Nancy K Janz; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer J Griggs; Ann S Hamilton; John Graff; Steven J Katz Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-09 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Victoria Blinder; Sujata Patil; Carolyn Eberle; Jennifer Griggs; Rose C Maly Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Christina L Rush; Margaret Darling; Maria Gloria Elliott; Ivis Febus-Sampayo; Charlene Kuo; Juliana Muñoz; Ysabel Duron; Migdalia Torres; Claudia Campos Galván; Florencia Gonzalez; Larisa Caicedo; Anna Nápoles; Roxanne E Jensen; Emily Anderson; Kristi D Graves Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Laura C Pinheiro; Devon K Check; Donald Rosenstein; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Stacie Dusetzina Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Anna María Nápoles; Carmen Ortiz; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Anita L Stewart; Howard E Lee; Ysabel Duron; Niharika Dixit; Judith Luce; Diana J Flores Journal: J Community Support Oncol Date: 2017
Authors: Peh Joo Ho; Mikael Hartman; Sofie A M Gernaat; Alex R Cook; Soo Chin Lee; Leon Hupkens; Helena M Verkooijen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603