Peh Joo Ho1, Mikael Hartman2,3, Sofie A M Gernaat4, Alex R Cook1, Soo Chin Lee5, Leon Hupkens6, Helena M Verkooijen7. 1. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. ephbamh@nus.edu.sg. 3. Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore, 117549, Singapore. ephbamh@nus.edu.sg. 4. Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. National Health System, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore. 6. Nyenrode Business University, Breukelen, The Netherlands. 7. Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Workability is of increasing importance especially in Asia given the increasing incidence rates and young age of onset of breast cancer. This study explores the determinants of employment and suboptimal workability. And evaluate the association between workability and patient-reported physical, psychological, and social outcomes. METHODS: In a hospital-based cross-sectional study, 327 breast cancer survivors, < 65 years of age and > 1 year post-diagnosis were recruited. Employed survivors filled out the workability index, which measures a person's capacity to meet work demands in relation to current health status. The EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BR23, hospital anxiety and depression scale, multidimensional fatigue inventory, and brief pain index were administered. Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test for associations of workability and employment status with demographic, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes. Linear models with standardised scores for patient-reported outcomes were fitted to study the associations of workability with patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 327 survivors, < 65 years of age (working age), 140 (43%) were in full-time and 34 (10%) in part-time employment. Employed survivors were younger at time of diagnosis and at time of survey. Employment status was not associated with time since diagnosis, ethnicity, or clinical characteristics. Suboptimal workability was present in 37% of employed survivors of the working age, and more common in jobs that include physical work activities. Higher level of depression, financial difficulty and physical fatigue, more breast symptoms, and poorer global health status were independently associated with poorer workability. CONCLUSIONS: Lower employment and reduced workability in breast cancer survivors is common, and reduced workability is associated with higher levels of depression, financial difficulty and physical fatigue, more breast symptoms, and poorer global health status. Longitudinal research on psychosocial support with workability in Asia may find tailored approach to improve or maintain workability in employed breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE: Workability is of increasing importance especially in Asia given the increasing incidence rates and young age of onset of breast cancer. This study explores the determinants of employment and suboptimal workability. And evaluate the association between workability and patient-reported physical, psychological, and social outcomes. METHODS: In a hospital-based cross-sectional study, 327 breast cancer survivors, < 65 years of age and > 1 year post-diagnosis were recruited. Employed survivors filled out the workability index, which measures a person's capacity to meet work demands in relation to current health status. The EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BR23, hospital anxiety and depression scale, multidimensional fatigue inventory, and brief pain index were administered. Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test for associations of workability and employment status with demographic, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes. Linear models with standardised scores for patient-reported outcomes were fitted to study the associations of workability with patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 327 survivors, < 65 years of age (working age), 140 (43%) were in full-time and 34 (10%) in part-time employment. Employed survivors were younger at time of diagnosis and at time of survey. Employment status was not associated with time since diagnosis, ethnicity, or clinical characteristics. Suboptimal workability was present in 37% of employed survivors of the working age, and more common in jobs that include physical work activities. Higher level of depression, financial difficulty and physical fatigue, more breast symptoms, and poorer global health status were independently associated with poorer workability. CONCLUSIONS: Lower employment and reduced workability in breast cancer survivors is common, and reduced workability is associated with higher levels of depression, financial difficulty and physical fatigue, more breast symptoms, and poorer global health status. Longitudinal research on psychosocial support with workability in Asia may find tailored approach to improve or maintain workability in employed breast cancerpatients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast neoplasms; Patient-reported outcome measures; Workability; employment
Authors: Deborah S Main; Carolyn T Nowels; Tia A Cavender; Martine Etschmaier; John F Steiner Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: A Mehnert; J Barth; M Gaspar; B Leibbrand; C-D Kegel; W Bootsveld; M Friedrich; T J Hartung; D Berger; U Koch Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Kathleen Oberst; Cathy J Bradley; Joseph C Gardiner; Maryjean Schenk; Charles W Given Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-06-12 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: A G E M de Boer; J H A M Verbeek; E R Spelten; A L J Uitterhoeve; A C Ansink; T M de Reijke; M Kammeijer; M A G Sprangers; F J H van Dijk Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Melissa A Carlson; Elizabeth A Fradgley; Paula Bridge; Jo Taylor; Sarah Morris; Emily Coutts; Christine Paul Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Fadime Cenik; Bruno Mähr; Stefano Palma; Mohammad Keilani; Thomas Nowotny; Richard Crevenna Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 1.704