OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of breast cancer on women's labor supply. DATE SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: Using the 1992 Health and Retirement Study, we estimate the probability of working using probit regression and then, for women who are employed, we estimate regressions for average weekly hours worked using ordinary least squares (OLS). We control for health status by using responses to perceived health status and comorbidities. For a sample of married women, we control for spouses' employer-based health insurance. We also perform additional analyses to detect selection bias in our sample. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We find that the probability of breast cancer survivors working is 10 percentage points less than that for women without breast cancer. Among women who work, breast cancer survivors work approximately three more hours per week than women who do not have cancer. Results of similar magnitude persist after health status is controlled in the analysis, and although we could not definitively rule out selection bias, we could not find evidence that our results are attributable to selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: For some women, breast cancer may impose an economic hardship because it causes them to leave theirjobs. However, for women who survive and remain working, this study failed to show a negative effect on hours worked associated with breast cancer. Perhaps the morbidity associated with certain types and stages of breast cancer and its treatment does not interfere with work.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of breast cancer on women's labor supply. DATE SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: Using the 1992 Health and Retirement Study, we estimate the probability of working using probit regression and then, for women who are employed, we estimate regressions for average weekly hours worked using ordinary least squares (OLS). We control for health status by using responses to perceived health status and comorbidities. For a sample of married women, we control for spouses' employer-based health insurance. We also perform additional analyses to detect selection bias in our sample. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We find that the probability of breast cancer survivors working is 10 percentage points less than that for women without breast cancer. Among women who work, breast cancer survivors work approximately three more hours per week than women who do not have cancer. Results of similar magnitude persist after health status is controlled in the analysis, and although we could not definitively rule out selection bias, we could not find evidence that our results are attributable to selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: For some women, breast cancer may impose an economic hardship because it causes them to leave theirjobs. However, for women who survive and remain working, this study failed to show a negative effect on hours worked associated with breast cancer. Perhaps the morbidity associated with certain types and stages of breast cancer and its treatment does not interfere with work.
Authors: P A Wingo; L A Ries; G A Giovino; D S Miller; H M Rosenberg; D R Shopland; M J Thun; B K Edwards Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-04-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: L S McGinnis; H R Menck; H J Eyre; K I Bland; C E Scott-Conner; M Morrow; D P Winchester Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Victoria S Blinder; Sujata Patil; Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Clifford A Hudis; Ethan Basch; Rose C Maly Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Sarah T Hawley; Paul Abrahamse; Yun Li; Nancy K Janz; Jennifer J Griggs; Cathy Bradley; John J Graff; Ann Hamilton; Steven J Katz Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Blythe Ryerson; Christie R Eheman; Sean F Altekruse; John W Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Recinda L Sherman; S Jane Henley; Deborah Holtzman; Andrew Lake; Anne-Michelle Noone; Robert N Anderson; Jiemin Ma; Kathleen N Ly; Kathleen A Cronin; Lynne Penberthy; Betsy A Kohler Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 6.860