S Larsen1, R Rabøl, C N Hansen, S Madsbad, J W Helge, F Dela. 1. Xlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3b, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. stelar@sund.ku.dk
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The glucose-lowering drug metformin has been shown to inhibit complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in skeletal muscle. To investigate this effect in vivo we studied skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiratory capacity and content from patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin (n = 14) or sulfonylurea (n = 8) and healthy control (n = 18) participants. METHODS: Mitochondrial respiratory capacity was measured ex vivo in permeabilised muscle fibres obtained from the vastus lateralis muscle of all participants. The respiratory response to in vitro titration with metformin was measured in controls. Citrate synthase (CS) activity, and fasting plasma glucose, insulin and HbA(1c) levels were measured and body composition was determined. RESULTS: Participants were matched for age, BMI and percentage body fat. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations were higher (p < 0.05) in those treated with sulfonylureas and metformin than in controls. CS activity was comparable between metformin-treated and control participants, but tended to be lower in those receiving sulfonylureas. Mitochondrial respiratory capacity with substrates for complex I and complex I and II was comparable in the groups, both when estimated per mg of tissue and when normalised to CS activity. In vitro metformin titration demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on complex I and II in human skeletal muscle at suprapharmacological concentrations. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Metformin treatment does not inhibit mitochondrial complex I respiration in the electron transport chain in human skeletal muscle of patients with type 2 diabetes when measured ex vivo. Inhibition of complex I and II respiration in controls was demonstrated by metformin titration in vitro at doses well above those observed during metformin treatment.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The glucose-lowering drug metformin has been shown to inhibit complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in skeletal muscle. To investigate this effect in vivo we studied skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiratory capacity and content from patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin (n = 14) or sulfonylurea (n = 8) and healthy control (n = 18) participants. METHODS: Mitochondrial respiratory capacity was measured ex vivo in permeabilised muscle fibres obtained from the vastus lateralis muscle of all participants. The respiratory response to in vitro titration with metformin was measured in controls. Citrate synthase (CS) activity, and fasting plasma glucose, insulin and HbA(1c) levels were measured and body composition was determined. RESULTS:Participants were matched for age, BMI and percentage body fat. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations were higher (p < 0.05) in those treated with sulfonylureas and metformin than in controls. CS activity was comparable between metformin-treated and control participants, but tended to be lower in those receiving sulfonylureas. Mitochondrial respiratory capacity with substrates for complex I and complex I and II was comparable in the groups, both when estimated per mg of tissue and when normalised to CS activity. In vitro metformin titration demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on complex I and II in human skeletal muscle at suprapharmacological concentrations. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:Metformin treatment does not inhibit mitochondrial complex I respiration in the electron transport chain in human skeletal muscle of patients with type 2 diabetes when measured ex vivo. Inhibition of complex I and II respiration in controls was demonstrated by metformin titration in vitro at doses well above those observed during metformin treatment.
Authors: Regitze Kraunsøe; Robert Boushel; Christina Neigaard Hansen; Peter Schjerling; Klaus Qvortrup; Mikael Støckel; Kári J Mikines; Flemming Dela Journal: J Physiol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: R S Hundal; M Krssak; S Dufour; D Laurent; V Lebon; V Chandramouli; S E Inzucchi; W C Schumann; K F Petersen; B R Landau; G I Shulman Journal: Diabetes Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Garry G Graham; Jeroen Punt; Manit Arora; Richard O Day; Matthew P Doogue; Janna K Duong; Timothy J Furlong; Jerry R Greenfield; Louise C Greenup; Carl M Kirkpatrick; John E Ray; Peter Timmins; Kenneth M Williams Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Cristina Carvalho; Sónia Correia; Maria S Santos; Raquel Seiça; Catarina R Oliveira; Paula I Moreira Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 3.396
Authors: Barbara Brunmair; Katrin Staniek; Florian Gras; Nicole Scharf; Aleksandra Althaym; Renate Clara; Michael Roden; Erich Gnaiger; Hans Nohl; Werner Waldhäusl; Clemens Fürnsinn Journal: Diabetes Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: E Tam; P Bruseghini; E Calabria; L Dal Sacco; C Doria; B Grassi; T Pietrangelo; S Pogliaghi; C Reggiani; D Salvadego; F Schena; L Toniolo; V Verratti; G Vernillo; Carlo Capelli Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Wouter De Haes; Lotte Frooninckx; Roel Van Assche; Arne Smolders; Geert Depuydt; Johan Billen; Bart P Braeckman; Liliane Schoofs; Liesbet Temmerman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 11.205