Literature DB >> 1600834

Sulfonylureas in NIDDM.

L C Groop1.   

Abstract

Sulfonylureas have represented the backbone of oral therapy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus for greater than 30 yr. Despite this, our knowledge about the mode of actions of these agents is limited, and the use of them is far from rational. Sulfonylureas lower blood glucose concentrations primarily by stimulating insulin secretion. The evidence for clinically significant extrapancreatic effects is scanty. Therefore, the effect of sulfonylurea is limited to patients with preserved beta-cell function, with the best effect observed in the early stages of the disease. Sulfonylurea treatment is often started relatively late and is continued when the agents can no longer achieve the treatment goals. Drug dosages are increased to maximum recommended doses, although there is no evidence for a dose-response relationship between the sulfonylurea dose and its biological effect. To rationalize the use of sulfonylureas, we should ask the questions to whom, how much, and for how long? The decision to stop treatment is as important as the decision to start treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1600834     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.15.6.737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  84 in total

Review 1.  Modern pharmacotherapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  S H Hsia
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe.

Authors:  S C Hood; L Annemans; M Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Drug treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the 1990s. Achievements and future developments.

Authors:  A J Scheen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Is impairment of ischaemic preconditioning by sulfonylurea drugs clinically important?

Authors:  J J Meier; B Gallwitz; W E Schmidt; A Mügge; M A Nauck
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Chances and risks of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Authors:  Peter Mayer
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Falsification Testing of Instrumental Variables Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Authors:  Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes have normal mitochondrial complex I respiration.

Authors:  S Larsen; R Rabøl; C N Hansen; S Madsbad; J W Helge; F Dela
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: the end of recurrent failure?

Authors:  R J Heine; M Diamant; J-C Mbanya; D M Nathan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-09

Review 9.  The role of pharmacogenetics in drug disposition and response of oral glucose-lowering drugs.

Authors:  N van Leeuwen; J J Swen; H-J Guchelaar; L M 't Hart
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Dose-response relation between sulfonylurea drugs and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Scot H Simpson; Sumit R Majumdar; Ross T Tsuyuki; Dean T Eurich; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.